Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (24375)	7/5/2006 9:18:52 PM
From: SiouxPal	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28931

Didn't he say that white holes actually don't exist in his opinion?

To: one_less who wrote (24375)	7/6/2006 10:39:39 AM
From: TigerPaw	Respond to of 28931

He is bound, however, to avoid that plague ... My world view has changed many times as I learn more information. One of Stephen Hawkings great ideas was that nothing, essentially the vaccum of space, could wiggle apart into two equal but opposite particles - say an electron and an anti-electron. Normally they would quickly recombine. If it possible that this could happen right at the event horizon of a black hole, in which case one particle could get sucked down the black hole leaving the other still observable in our universe. It would appear to an observer that this particle came from nothing. If we take this into the realm of invisible pink rabbits, then our whole universe may have come from the vaccum of space next to a black hole even heavier than our whole universe. The anti-universe got sucked away and we are what is left. This notion is a lot of speculation. That doesn't mean it's not true or that it is true, it means who have no clue. TP