Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (204252)	7/5/2006 9:59:43 PM
From: steve harris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

Still contracting for Intel elmer? Welcome back, come on over and have some fun... Subject 473 Is pAUL with you?

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (204252)	7/5/2006 10:03:20 PM
From: Dan3	Respond to of 275872

Re: AMD has to cut prices to dump product. Schizophrenia can be cured - well medicated, anyway. Anyone who's been following Intel (with it's Intel 65nm process) and AMD and doesn't understand that Intel slashed prices and AMD followed much later should seek medical attention. Note also that AMD's old (and inexpensive) 90nm process has delivered 35w parts to dealer's shelves while Intel's expensive 65nm process has yet to do so. As 65nm equipment becomes less expensive and more proven, AMD is moving to a 65nm process that need only be slightly better than their 90nm process to dominate Intel - and it will likely be a lot more than slightly better. AMD is supplying a quarter of the market with a tenth the number of staff - and much less costs. See if you can figure out just how disastrous for Intel that is, both short term and long term.

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (204252)	7/5/2006 10:08:02 PM
From: clspie	Respond to of 275872

Phudddddddddddddddddddddddddddd!!!!!!

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (204252)	7/5/2006 11:02:14 PM
From: gzubeck	Respond to of 275872

10 months elmo...did someone let you out of jail? ;>)))) The Phoenix of Phud has arisen....HEEE HEEE HHEEE....

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (204252)	7/5/2006 11:21:01 PM
From: Magrathea	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

I have made a ton of $$ writing Puts Just my opinion, but I think that claim just cost you a ton of credibility and the right to criticize anyone else for back dated trades. I can't count the number of times you ridiculed NG for his late posting. Now you do it your first post in 10 months. You are on record for NOW going to (unspecified) naked calls. Good luck to you. -Magrathea

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (204252)	7/6/2006 12:41:53 AM
From: Gary Hoyer	Respond to of 275872

I sense a different writing style and tone, it's not the same guy.

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (204252)	7/6/2006 2:39:23 AM
From: titon1	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 275872

Still convinced Intel was making money in flash? How much money did you lose with AMD from 25 to 42?

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (204252)	7/6/2006 8:07:25 AM
From: mas_	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

LOL, the cowardly phudster plucks up enough courage to return ;-). So how much money did you lose when AMD went up from its 'natural' range of 10-15 to 42 ? ;-). You're going to lose a lot more when it still sticks around 30 you know so just keep writing those naked calls ;-). Btw didn't anyone tell you yet, Core 2 don't do Raid well and there are no motherboards so an alleged theoretical performance lead ain't going to be of much use here ;-). Also it's Intel cutting prices to dump product but you were never too hot on the truth ;-). Happy Investing ...