SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: JohnM who wrote (23032)7/6/2006 7:45:11 AM
From: Dale Baker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541374
 
The challenge is convincing people they must do "something" with no proof that any amount of "somethings" will have a tangible impact on this huge problem that can't be clearly and comprehensively defined. Now if everyone wants to recycle and do their little bit, that will probably work.

But if you move to the next step and people are being asked to give up their cars and suburban lifestyle and return to some kind of urban austerity and crowds for the sake of saving civilization, I don't think that will sell.

Gore's appeal ran to a fraction over 50% of the popular vote six years ago. Today I believe he polls much lower. So how we get from minority views to a majority consensus for action when the science and the scenario for saving the planet is so squishy.....I just don't see it working in the heartland. JMHO.

pollingreport.com



To: JohnM who wrote (23032)7/7/2006 6:37:38 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 541374
 

For instance, take Al Gore. It's been well known, for well over a decade that environmental issues were one of his signature political vocations. Yet Gore actually won the popular vote in 2000.


Against a mediocre Republican candidate, after having been VP during a sustained period of decent economic growth, and with a campaign where he didn't go hard sell on the environment.