Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (71642)	7/7/2006 3:03:53 PM
From: one_less	Respond to of 173976

The current problem is more serious and is two fold. 1) We definitely have a condition that can with validity be termed 'Global Warming.' Other associated challenges complicate human decision making around this issue, like energy development and consumption. This is a complicated set of circumstances that is best left to uncorrupted scientific development to deal with. This is already a problem because virtually all of the study and development grants that have been issued over the past few years have a socio/political bias associated with them. So we don't have a body of objective scientists who can serve as a review team... except maybe some retired professors but they aren't part of the system 2) There is a push to politicize 'global warming' that would be more devastating to global societies than the actual environmental circumstance.