Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (3246)	7/7/2006 3:31:38 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224660

I never lie. I stand by all my statements, except maybe 1% honest errors like getting a number wrong, like anyone else. If I make a mistake, which is very rare, I apologize. I can't look at those because I have those people on ignore, but they are well-known BS artists who support corruption and election fraud. I checked one or two and they are statements I stand by. If you want to, present them to me one by one and I will explain. I repeat, I stand by everything I state, though I may occasionally be wrong. If I ever am, it is not intentional. So I never lie.

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (3246)	7/7/2006 4:06:31 PM
From: American Spirit	Respond to of 224660

Peter, I checked out some of my supposed "lies". They don't even make any sense. I never said Cheney was the mastermind behind 9-11, for instance. Though I may have said "it almost makes me wonder if Cheney ---" That's because Cheney is so damned dishonest and manipulative and doesn't seem to give a damn about ethics. Plus he was definitely the most rabid liar to get us into Iraq on false pretenses. In fact he continues lying about it. The rest of it just seems to be blanket claims that I lie, which I never do. Maybe you guys don't believe some it because it's painful, but I tell the truth and my common sense intuition is also excellent. So if you have something solid to confront me with which is a deliberaste lie, do it. If not, then shut up. Also, I have always admitted I sometimes make innocent minor errors. I post from memory mostly and it's not a perfect science. However, I stand by 99.5% of most posts. That's about as accurate as anyone can get.

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (3246)	7/7/2006 4:08:53 PM
From: American Spirit	Respond to of 224660

Actually, I'm not accusing you of lying big-time. I just checked more of your so-called "evidence" for my "lies". What a bunch of total BS. Sully defending Jeff Gannon the male prostitute in the White House? Citing Newsmax and the NY Sun as sources? Claiming Kerry lied about being in Cambodia? All nonsense. If you are going to try and prove someone lied, at least use credible evidence not rightwing smear sites and angry extremist rightwing hit pieces.

To: Peter Dierks who wrote (3246)	7/7/2006 4:11:33 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224660

You want dishonesty, let's talk about Bush's "terrorists" he's busted in the past few weeks. From what I can gather both groups, in Florida and NYC who were hyped as major league "threats" to Chicago and NYC are both smalltime, un-armed, non alligned nut jobs who never got beyond the big talk stages. Well if you're going to call every nut in America who blabs about wanting to blow something up a "terrorist" then we have plenty of them, including on the far right. And the only Americans who've actually blown anything major up are on the far right. I'm talking about Timothy McVeigh and his pals. Clearly, Rove is at it again. Announcing phony "victories" in the war on terror whnile the real terrorists are still loose 5 years after 9-11 and we're bogged down in Iraq, a country which had nothing to do with 9-11 or Al Qaida.