Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (23248)	7/7/2006 5:32:17 PM
From: Dale Baker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541344

I had a minor brain seizure just reading that sentence. Deriving meaning left me short-circuited, LOL.

To: Lane3 who wrote (23248)	7/7/2006 6:06:42 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541344

I wouldn't have any problem assessing the notion that there is no anthropogenic global warming as "flat earth." I would. It never was an idea that I would have fully supported, and now I might go as far as saying that it isn't very reasonable, but "flat earth" speaks to a whole different level of unreasonableness. In any case my real question was about "inevitable major disaster without an immediate major changes" so it seems that you do agree with me about the question that I actually asked. Sorry that it was so difficult to divine the question. <g> Sometimes my lacking of editing, results in sentences like that, but if I stopped and edited my posts I'd never keep up on SI. I do think the vast majority of my questions and statements on SI are more intelligible than that one.