To: Srexley who wrote (744848 ) 7/9/2006 12:13:20 PM From: DuckTapeSunroof Respond to of 769669 Army, Taxed by War Costs, Struggles to Pay Bills at Home July 9, 2006 By THE ASSOCIATED PRESSnytimes.com FORT SAM HOUSTON, Tex., July 8 (AP) — A diversion of money for the war in Iraq has helped create a $530 million shortfall for Army posts at home and abroad, leaving some of them unable to pay utility bills or even cut the grass, military officials say. In San Antonio, Fort Sam Houston has not paid its $1.4 million monthly utility bill since March, prompting workers in many of the post's administrative buildings to receive automated disconnection notices. Fort Bragg in North Carolina says it will not buy any office supplies until the new fiscal year starts in October. And in Kentucky, Fort Knox closed one of its eight dining halls for a month and laid off 133 contract workers. "Every time something goes away, it impacts a person: a soldier or their family or one of our civilians," said Col. Wendy Martinson, garrison commander at Fort Sam Houston, which has 27,300 military and civilian workers. "I'm charged with taking care of them, not taking things away from them." Garrisons function as the city halls of Army installations, providing services like garbage removal, mail delivery and firefighting. The Installation Management Agency of the Army is $530 million short of what it needs through Oct. 1 to finance garrisons at the 117 installations it oversees in the United States, Europe and Asia, said an agency spokesman, Stephen Oertwig. The increasing cost of fuel is partly to blame, and it costs more to pay civilians in Asia and Europe, Mr. Oertwig said. Another major factor is the practice of financing the war through spending bills outside the annual budget. As Congress spent months debating a supplemental spending bill, the Army had to divert money from the Installation Management Agency's budget to cover the cost of the war, Mr. Oertwig said. The Army often diverts operations money for other programs, in times of war and peace, said Jeremiah Gertler, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. The supplemental spending bill usually replenishes those funds. This year, though, most of the military money in the $94.5 billion bill was earmarked for the war, leaving little to pay back operations accounts, Mr. Gertler said. Military officials could have asked for more money to ease the garrison budget crunch, but they knew a bigger request would have created a bigger fight in Congress, Mr. Gertler said. "The Pentagon is reluctant to ask for any more than they need for the war because it all looks like it's going to the war and becomes a very controversial bill," Mr. Gertler said. But Michael O'Hanlon, a military analyst at the Brookings Institution, the liberal-leaning research organization, said money management seemed to be the larger problem. The Defense Department spends about as much on maintenance and operations as it does on weapons and personnel combined, Mr. O'Hanlon said, so there should be more than enough for the bills. "It makes me worry if the Pentagon can't do its accounting well enough to find money for its electric bills," he said. "It just boggles my mind a little bit." The legislation that Congress approved on June 15 included $722 million for the Installation Management Agency, to be split among its installations. Colonel Martinson did not know how much Fort Sam Houston would get, but she said she expected it would be enough to pay the electricity bill. A spokesman for CPS Energy said the company understood the problem and would not turn off the lights any time soon. However, the new money will not save the jobs of about 100 contract workers Colonel Martinson dismissed. Copyright 2006 The New York Times Company