Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: RealMuLan who wrote (65679)	7/9/2006 3:46:12 PM
From: C.N.S.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 110194

I understand that the situation is unpleasant. But are you saying that there are no Chinese to blame at all for this ? Even the company management who are not even taking the risk of balancing their cash flows while paying stupendously low salaries (if what you are saying is true - that the salaries are held back till full payment on the invoices ?) Is there a law in China that prevents Chinese factories from declining such contracts from US companies ? Or are you saying that US companies stipulate in their contracts that workers should work for 12 hours but be paid for 8 and that their salaries be held back till full payment of invoices ?

To: RealMuLan who wrote (65679)	7/9/2006 5:05:13 PM
From: Gib Bogle	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 110194

How can the added option of a job, however unattractive, make someone worse off? Basic economics (actually basic common sense) says that extra options can at worst leave your situation unchanged. Or are you saying that people are forced to take these jobs?