Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LLCF who wrote (24487)	7/9/2006 8:01:34 PM
From: Solon	Respond to of 28931

I think that "We don't consider all forms of energy to be "life"" was a reasonable response to the statement you made equating energy with life in terms of their permanence. There was no intention to alter what you said. My response simply showed that the Law of the Conservation of energy is NOT equivalent to a Law of the Conservation of life. So life is very much UNLIKE energy in terms of permanence. That is what I was saying in a shorter form and I was not attributing that awareness to you. It was my post and my statement and certainly was not what you said. It is simply untrue that life cannot be created or destroyed. You might want to acknowledge that point rather than quibbling.