Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: geode00 who wrote (191338)	7/10/2006 5:03:19 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

You guys must really despise your corrupt administration. After all, you're saying that Dubyette and crew are so inept, so corrupt, so stupid, so udderly incompetent that they let their primary job (protecting the US) go belly up and let WMDs go into Syria. So you're saying that the US should have attacked Syria and Lebanon as well based upon this belief that this it is the duty of the US to prevent nations from possessing WMDs? Should we have attacked N. Korea when it was apparent to the Clinton administration that Kim Il Sung was developing WMDs? I don't think you really want to go in this direction, if you're hoping to make a case for which party is better at halting proliferation of WMDs. Note that after the PSI discovered Libya was importing nuclear centrifuges, they quickly abandoned all attempts at developing nukes... And there has been a major change in the relations between our nations.. (for the positive, I hope).. So ask yourself why you're unable to admit mistakes and negligence under democratic administrations, rather than simply focusing on the present one?? What are you going to do if a Democrat enters the White House in 2008?? You'll be out of a job... LOL!!! Hawk