Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jackjc who wrote (15725)	7/10/2006 3:20:07 PM
From: vireya	Respond to of 78418

edit

To: jackjc who wrote (15725)	7/10/2006 3:58:16 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 78418

The gap-fill doesn't do the whole job, i don't believe that, or know anyone who has expressed it that way ... what it does is remove a good deal of trepidation from an entry/addition above that figure, that's all ... sometimes they do just exactly fill the gap and bounce back - check out gyd.v three weeks ago for an example, printed .61 which is exactly what it needed, then bounced into the .80s ... this is fairly common, but it doesn't have to do that immediately ... i've got gyd.v on watch [it's back in the .60s again now], but <sigh> no ammo to play with 'if it takes til Sept.' - can't see that happening, jack ... Amex listing should be coming near that time, and they usually trade up somewhat before .... ? ... they've got a mine, there is little question of this, it's only a matter of how big, what size of IRR, and how much to finance ... correct me if i'm wrong there ... and it's zinc largely, high grade in a politically stable and cheap-to-mine part of this very continent ... just got another small fill ... well i'm talked out on mmgg now ... for the moment -g-