Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JDN who wrote (744951)	7/10/2006 7:36:15 PM
From: Peter Dierks	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

We agree that NK is a military state with dynastic ambitions. We agree that NK would destroy much of SK in the opening salvo of a war. That being agreed upon the whole idea of using nukes even to disarm a puke is morally repugnant. HT had a very different choice and he madea tough one. My father was a FO in WWII and I have heard a few stories. Our best strategy would be to keep Americans out of SK until we either mostly disarmed NK or they spent a good percentage of their weapons. I cannot imagine they could make more that fast. What condition are the weapons in? Would a twenty year old ordinance stored in a humid jungle still be effective?