Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sageyrain who wrote (15752)	7/10/2006 9:55:31 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78419

I seen Cdn roche jes like that stuff, colour wise. well, ok, maybe not. Some Kerr Addison rock was sometimes brownish, the flow ore. However it was not qv. what it was, was a strange animal with no visible feeders. But it was part of a hydrothermal system, so it had to have feeders, just invisible to the naked eye. Or the microscope either I heard. And large euhedral py. Ore in the Queen Charlottes was very late I was told, perhaps triassic and it was in a porphyry, which was blue, white and black... The nature of the veining I would still recognize and the nature of the quartz. It looks juicy. The worst looking quartz I ever saw was in Timmins. It always looked like bull quartz, and then there is gold in it. Truble is, much of the bull quartz you see lives up to its reputation quite nicely. The Hollinger ore, however was often juicy with lots of sericite and pyrite and shear. Ore in KL in the syenite or in the conglomerate often had no quartz at all. just gold in cracks in the rock. no alteration, no nothing. In other areas the qv system relented and showed its slip. EC<:-}