Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve harris who wrote (294231)	7/11/2006 12:40:12 PM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573717

Just doesn't seem fair does it.

To: steve harris who wrote (294231)	7/11/2006 1:50:46 PM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573717

Wow, cutting taxes increases tax revenues.... Who would have thunkit? So when do we achieve a surplus ? By the way, how much money did they have to borrow from SS again to claim only ($2980B)in the red? Al

To: steve harris who wrote (294231)	7/11/2006 1:56:31 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573717

"Wow, cutting taxes increases tax revenues...." On the issue of whether or not tax cuts can increase revenue: I don't think that, as a general rule, that tax cuts pay for themselves. taxfoundation.org

To: steve harris who wrote (294231)	7/17/2006 4:25:23 AM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1573717

In 2005, tax revenues grew by $274 billion, or 14.5 percent; it's the largest increase in 24 years. tax revenues? I thought Bush was cutting taxes? Wow, cutting taxes increases tax revenues.... Who would have thunkit? Yeah, Bush is an economic genius...who would have thunkit. Just a quick question.......you don't see anything wrong with the picture? Hint: the deficits have been smaller that the WH's predictions for each of the last three years. Think spin and I think you'll get it.....maybe not.