Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (191455)	7/12/2006 1:25:58 AM
From: geode00	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

1. PROVE IT. Prove it and, if you can, prove that it has anything to do with Saddam's nonexistent WMDs. Laura Bush killed a man. Why don't you care about that? 2. World net daily...are you kidding? 3. Did you read the Telegraph's article which you pointed to and the others it linked to? Did you notice the dates? Did you notice these: "...Mr Ritter said that he had rebuffed each attempt and filed reports on the approaches to the FBI. He had also filed reports to the US Treasury when he was raising the money for Shifting Sands. "Be careful how you interpret those documents," he said. "I would hate to read that I had taken Iraqi money, which I did not...." Dubyette: "...The central plank of the Bush case, however, is to be Iraq's continued pursuit of a nuclear capability, efforts that the administration believes are dangerously close to success. "The president is heavily focused on the nuclear issue," said one government official..." telegraph.co.uk Ritter: "...He argues that Iraq's arsenal of nuclear, chemical and biological weapons has been all but dismantled by UN weapons inspectors; any missiles remaining are unlikely to work, and the stocks of chemical and biological weapons have degraded to the point of being useless. "This is a war based on speculative rhetoric, not fact," he said. Three French MPs found no evidence that Iraq is producing or developing weapons of mass destruction, in a visit to its former main nuclear plant, the official Iraqi News Agency reported. They arrived in Baghdad at the weekend to visit sites suspected by Washington of producing such weapons...." ================== Do you actually read anything even when you point to it? After Ritter and Dulfer, 3 1/2 years, $300+ billion you still believe that Saddam was within 45 minutes of launching nuclear missiles? You believe that Santorum was right about those toxic kitchen sink munitions? You believe that those aluminum tubes were meant to be re-milled and reformed in order to be used in centrifuges? You believe all this baloney....STILL? Isn't it just so much more sensible to understand that Dubyette has been lying to you all along and that you have been absurdly gullible for a sentient adult human being? OMG. You are NUTS.