SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 4C who wrote (15931)7/12/2006 12:18:35 AM
From: onepath  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78419
 
All valid points.Add in the confusion over proposed new extended Nahanni Park boundaries and whether they could affect PAX.This is a long way from a mine and I am far from being in love with it.The big prize is the potential size and I mentioned in a previous post that I did not think the present mgmt. would mine it.As long as they keep getting results and zinc stays strong it should remain a good spec.Years away from a mine if ever and then only if it is proved up and sold as a major deposit.BWR .wts are a much safer proxy on zinc but PAX appeals to the gamble side in me.lol



To: 4C who wrote (15931)7/12/2006 1:43:56 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78419
 
I think that is sound reasoning STF and is how I see it as well. But I also bought PAX for the reasons onepath gives and Herb's reasons as well, which I share.

Herb, or Max-can't remember.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News