Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (191464)	7/12/2006 3:42:11 AM
From: geode00	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Do you actually READ your own links? Why don't you read your own links first? "..."The US government is well aware of where the money came from for the film. It came from me and two colleagues. It was checked by the government. It came from personal assets and from bank loans," he said..." Besides which it would have said, what, that Saddam did not have WMDs. Gee. Since Saddam did not have WMDs what exactly is the problem? --------- 1. I don't have to defend Ritter. Ritter needs no defending as the facts are on his side. 2. Ritter was right 3. Bush is a liar 4. Bush has been proven to be a liar by everyone including Dulfer, weapons experts, nuclear scientists, 150K troops on the ground, Powell and even his 1% doctrine master, Dick Cheney. I find it amazing that you provide links to prove your point but those links say just the opposite. It prove to me that you don't do any research but cut and paste whatever you dang well please without regards to WHAT THE ARTICLE ACTUALLY SAYS. It proves yet again that the right is lazy and ignorant and is, therefore, ripe for propaganda. Rove has found a way to 'catapult the propaganda,' he just finds the lazy and ignorant and gives them lies to swallow.