SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (191476)7/12/2006 2:23:47 PM
From: geode00  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Hawkmoon, resident hypocrite LOL

"Furthermore, heated and personalized rhetoric is being spewed around that detracts from objective analysis." ---- Hawkmoon

"Hey Moron..." ---- Hawkmoon in the next post

============== I don't care about heated or personalized rhetoric. I do care about your lack of research, factual support and reasoned analysis.

1. You do not know about the money for the movie. You are actually making things up since YOUR OWN LINKS do not support your contention.

You are now verging on the absolute bonkers.

2. You just said that Ritter took money for propaganda and then you said that Ritter covered his tracks so where is the evidence that he took money for propaganda if he covered his tracks?

You are actually contradicting yourself...again. You are really going over the edge.



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (191476)7/12/2006 2:43:31 PM
From: geode00  Respond to of 281500
 
I forgot to add that Ritter was correct and proven so....by the Bush administration.

I thought the WMD thing wasn't making sense and I was just using publicly available information such as it was. It's so obvious that the Bush administration KNEW FOR SURE that there were no WMDs and that they were lying.