Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mimur who wrote (56817)	7/12/2006 10:47:45 AM
From: Land Shark	Respond to of 313071

Great stuff. Thanks for the post. Nice to see some real info.

To: mimur who wrote (56817)	7/12/2006 10:52:01 AM
From: TheSlowLane	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 313071

Oh baby. This is the gift that keeps on giving.

To: mimur who wrote (56817)	7/12/2006 10:55:00 AM
From: MonetizeMe	Respond to of 313071

Thanks, Mimur.

To: mimur who wrote (56817)	7/12/2006 8:10:33 PM
From: sageyrain	Respond to of 313071

Thanks Mimur, its very useful to get property info in between press releases from people that have seen things first hand. "Hole 61 is on the same section as #56 (205 m @ 8.4 g/t), stepping out the west. It did intersect the down-dropped fault block, but only for a few metres, so deeper drilling is required to extend the deposit to the west. The grade of this hole could be very good with some large visible gold observed in the core, but likely 80 m in thickness or so, ending the hole in a mineralized porpyry with copper that could be related to the gold mineralization above." The Goldmarca ground, as well as the "National Reserve" ground may become a real thorn in ARU's side if it turns out that the FDN zone is sitting on top of a large porphyry Cu. files.newswire.ca And how about that National Reserve. Makes one worry that the Reserve might be easily expanded if the Ecuadorian gov starts to get greedy.