SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: thames_sider who wrote (24022)7/13/2006 4:57:32 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 541109
 
I do think it is important to distinguish between soldiers and non- soldiers. For example, during the Nazi occupation of Europe many would see the killing of a Nazi soldier as a legitimate act of war, even by "terrorists". I would find it hard to distinguish other terrorists in occupied territories from the folks who fought the Nazis. For that reason I put it the way that I did. Terrorism is not always "wrong", not even from a general US perspective- I think most people support the "terrorist" groups that worked against the Nazis. I think most of us understand why oppressed people whose countries have been occupied resort to terrorism. People in the US used to think the Taleban acts of terrorism against the Russians were laudable.

Sorting the "good" terrorists from the "bad" ones usually depends on subjective judgments, but the difference between a soldier and a civilian is usually more objective (though not always, a la Veitnam).



To: thames_sider who wrote (24022)7/19/2006 1:16:17 PM
From: TimF  Respond to of 541109
 
But one evil does not justify a greater evil. And it's starting to really hack me off when Israel claims the privileges of a civilised country, but refuses to follow civilised rules.

If militants affiliated with a major Mexican party, who had members in their parliament captured and killed American soldiers or border patrol agents, refused to release them unless we released a bunch of Mexicans or Mexican Americans from our prisons, moved them deeper in to Mexico, fired rockets in the the US, and faced no counter action from the Mexican police or military, than the US might militarily intervene in Mexico and it would not fall outside the bounds of the actions of a civilized country, or of civilized international rules.