SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mr. Palau who wrote (745308)7/14/2006 12:56:12 PM
From: Hope Praytochange  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769668
 
Court Restores Nebraska's Same-Sex Marriage Ban
By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Filed at 12:11 p.m. ET

LINCOLN, Neb. (AP) -- Supporters of banning gay marriage won two major court rulings Friday, with a federal appeals court reinstating Nebraska's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage and the Tennessee Supreme Court ruling that voters should have a say on the issue.

Last week, the highest courts in two others states also dealt gay rights advocates setbacks. The New York court rejected a bid by same-sex couples to win marriage rights, and the Georgia court reinstated a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage there.

In the Nebraska case, U.S. District Judge Joseph Bataillon had ruled that the ban was too broad and deprived gays and lesbians of participation in the political process, among other things.

The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed, saying in its ruling Friday that the amendment ''and other laws limiting the state-recognized institution of marriage to heterosexual couples are rationally related to legitimate state interests and therefore do not violate the Constitution of the United States.''

Seventy percent of Nebraska voters approved the ban in 2000.

Attorney General Jon Bruning had argued earlier for the ban should to be restored, saying it didn't violate anyone's freedom of expression or association.

Opponents of the ban ''are free to gather, express themselves, lobby, and generally participate in the political process however they see fit,'' Bruning said. ''Plaintiffs are free to petition state senators to place a constitutional amendment on the ballot. Plaintiffs are similarly free to begin an initiative process to place a constitutional amendment on the ballot, just as supporters ... did.''

The lawsuit challenging the ban was filed by New York-based Lambda and the ACLU's Lesbian and Gay Project. Officials there could not immediately be reached for comment.

The Nebraska amendment went farther than similar bans in many states in that it also barred same-sex couples from many legal protections afforded heterosexual couples. For example the partners of gays and lesbians who work for the state are not entitled to share their health insurance and other benefits.



To: Mr. Palau who wrote (745308)7/15/2006 10:08:23 AM
From: PROLIFE  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769668
 
Mohamedjones, as I said, you really need to rethink your relationship with your camel. You have become just a blathering idiot...