Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: geode00 who wrote (191663)	7/14/2006 5:54:18 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

You need to go back and READ. Even the Dubyettes, mostly urged on by Powell, were considering going back to the UN to get authorization TO ATTACK. They figured out that they would not get that authorization so they refused to GO BACK TO THE UN. It was not an authorization to attack. They had all they they legally needed under 1441. The resolution in question only have re-affirmed that Iraq was not in compliance. The only reason it was even proposed was because France and Russia were attempting to thwart having their illegal and secret dealings with Saddam's regime uncovered in the aftermath of his overthrow. And even then.. had France and Russia not threatened a veto, it would have had sufficient votes to pass. You're wrong and yet you're still shilling for the people who hate and spit on you. What makes you possibly believe I'd ever "shill" for the likes of people like yourself?? Hawk