SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : GOPwinger Lies/Distortions/Omissions/Perversions of Truth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (72237)7/15/2006 10:10:48 AM
From: Thomas A Watson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
LOL.. galaway... another delusion article from team dementia.... You need some sanity..

This is thought out, So it's over your head.

THE ANSWER IS NO

I think we finally have the answer to the strategic question of our times. Is Islam compatible with freedom and democracy? and the corrolary: Can the roots of terrorism be cut off by instituting democratic reform in the Middle East?

President Bush has believed that it is worth it to answer that question with a "Yes!" and all his actions have been based on that fact. This is why he has been very circumspect in what he says about Islam and how he characterizes the war on terror. Once a "tipping point" is reached where most reasonable people can no longer believe that a moderate, reasonable Islam is possible, then the unpalatable consequences of a "No" answer become all too obvious.

As recent events in the middle east between Israel and Hisbollah and Hamas, Syria and Iran unfold; as we witness the desperate suicide bombers and mindless hate that daily disrupts any kind of a normal life for Iraqis in Baghdad; as we witness the rise of the fanatical and murdering Taliban in Afghanistan--the only conclusion that reasonable people can come to is that the answer is no.

Islam is not only incompatible with these concepts, but modern day Islamists are determined that a medieval Islam should remain completely antithetical to such concepts. The Mullahs and Imans; the fanatics and barbarians; the petty despots and tyrannical kings of Islam around the world-- are all united in their evil vision for all of mankind--and no olive branch; no amount of appeasement; and no appeal to reason and good will is capable of bringing them into the fold of humankind.

Andy McCarthy wrote just yesterday:


We've been told for some time now — against common sense and the weight of our own national experience — that the way to defeat international jihadism is to spread democracy.

So now the Lebanese democracy can't control Hezbollah (which has been freely elected and controls about a fifth of its legislature), while the Palestinian Authority IS Hamas (the Palestinian people having democratically put them in power).

How much do we figure that Israel is hoping democracy breaks out in Egypt, with the Muslim Brotherhood and Islamic Jihad waiting in the wings? All it needs right about now is yet another democratic neighbor.

Democracy has many enduring benefits, but it doesn't stop terrorists from operating — and in many ways, it makes life easier for them. When are we going to stop talking about it as a national security cure-all?

We have to kill al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas and the rest. This is harder work than the administration's rhetoric is preparing the nation for. We are not going to democratize these savages into submission.


America has just celebrated its 230th birthday--and yet, we are continuing to find homegrown terrorists on our own soil. Some of these pathetic people have had the benefits of freedom and choice for their entire lives--but the poison of Islam is strong, and they are determined--along with their Islamic brothers--to destroy any free country that stands in the way of their vision.

They hate America because, when freedom reigns, their sad beliefs will never be more than in the minority. When people are free to choose, and not killed for apostasy for not choosing Islam, they will be unable to force their beliefs on others. Because, make no mistake about it, Islam is the 21st century's totalitarianism. Just as socialism and communism were the 20th century's.

After two world wars, humanity had pretty much rid itself of the bane of socialism and its more immature sibling communism. Only to see it rise up again, hanging on the coattails of Islam.

I wrote in an earlier piece:


Leaders like the Mullahs and Ahmadinejad in Iran and Hamas in Gaza are acting in ways that will facilitate a confrontation. They foolishly believe that the West will back down--if not because of a belief in the superiority of Islam; then from doubts about the superiority of Western values and from a reluctance to act decisively and ruthlessly.

The psychopathic elements in Islam believe this is our fundamental weakness; but they are wrong. This is actually our fundamental strength. President Bush has bet that Islam can be changed if it is infused with some democratic opportunities and freed from some of the political and religious tyranny that has dominated the Middle East. If such a democratizing process had been started--and carried through-- a decade or two earlier, well who knows how much the situation might have changed by now?

And, contrary to the infantile imaginings of the antiwar and so-called "peace" movements, [who have all the fervor of true marxists awaiting their worker's paradise], Bush's strategy actually represents the Best. Possible. Hope. For. Peace.

It is a strategy that faces the grim reality of Islamic contradictions and historical brutality; yet has enough optimism and goodwill in it to be genuinely worth the price we are paying. If it works, millions of deaths might be prevented. And if the peace crowd really cares about peace, then they would do well to reconsider their own antics.

Because, if the left succeeds in its determination to undermine American policy as it is now formulated; or if the extremists succeed in eliminating any voices for moderation and tolerance; then there will be only one strategic option open.


I hope I am wrong about all this, because many lives lie in the balance. But I think that the recent actions of Hamas and Hisbollah; the fact that Iran will not accept even a sweetheart deal offered to it by the US and EU to abandon their nuclear ambitions; and the fact that both Iran and Syria are actively undermining Iraqi freedom; that all these things represent a irreversible tipping point.

Even the dhimmist bulb in the EU; the most deliberately and consciously delusional member of the international peace crowd cannot fail to see the lack of good will; the perverse determination to provoke war; and the genocidal glint in the eyes of Islam's brightest stars.

The answer to that all-important question upon which the fate of the world hangs is... NO.

- Diagnosed by Dr. Sanity @ 9:52 AM Comment (0) | Trackback (0)



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (72237)7/15/2006 10:11:24 AM
From: Crimson Ghost  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 173976
 
Americans Are Being Misled to War.
by Paul Craig Roberts.

A terrible thing is happening, and not enough Americans are aware to be able
to do anything about it. Zionists in Israel and in the Bush administration
are leading America into war with Iran, Syria, Hizbollah in Lebanon and
Hamas in Palestine.

The consequences for America, Israel and the Middle East will be disastrous,
but as long as Washington is in thrall to Zionist paranoia, nothing can be
done about it. Bush made this clear on July 14 when he rejected the plea
from Lebanon's prime minister to pressure Israel to stop its attack on
Lebanon.

The war began when Bush's neoconservative government invaded Afghanistan and
Iraq under the pretense of "fighting terrorism." Neither front has gone well
for America. The Israelis, seeing the growing domestic opposition to Bush's
wars of choice, concluded that they are in danger of losing America's
military intervention in behalf of their Middle East interests. Israel
decided to force the issue.

Israel did this by bombing and invading Gaza, from which they had just
withdrawn as part of a "Palestinian settlement." Israel's pretext was the
capture of one Israeli soldier in Gaza in retribution for Israel's genocidal
policies toward Palestine. Few Americans know that Israel has forced
Palestinians into ghettos and walled them off from their farm lands,
schools, and medical treatment.

By slaughtering scores of civilians and destroying the infrastructure of the
fragile land in response to the capture of one Israeli soldier, Israel has
made it clear that its policy is fire and sword.

Under international law – the identical law that was used to try Nazi war
criminals after World War II – Israel's invasion of Gaza is a monstrous war
crime. The United Nations top humanitarian official, Jan Egeland, said that
Israel's attacks on civilians and infrastructure violated international law.

On July 13, the UN Security Council tried to condemn Israel for its criminal
invasion of Gaza, but US Ambassador John Bolton, a rabid pro-Israeli zealot,
vetoed the Security Council resolution that would have required Israel to
halt its illegal and criminal actions in Gaza. Bolton is the UN ambassador
who could not get confirmed even in a Republican Senate and was given a
recess appointment by Bush in defiance of Congress.

On July 12, Israel invaded Lebanon. The pretext was the capture of two
Israeli soldiers in Israeli-occupied Lebanese territory by Hizbollah. In two
days Israel has slaughtered scores of Lebanese civilians, destroyed bridges
and power plants, attacked the Beruit International Airport and blocked
Lebanese ports.

Israel's over-reactions are calculated to start a wider war. Israel has
asserted that the two soldiers captured by Hizbollah are being held in Iran.
Israel blames Syria for Hizbollah's acts. Both Israel and its neoconsevative
allies in the Bush government blame Iran and Syria for "attacks on Israel"
by Hamas and Hizbollah. No one, least of all Bush, blames Israel's
Palestinian policy.

Israel's American agents, the neoconservatives, have made it clear for years
that their goal is to eliminate every Middle Eastern government that is not
ruled by an American puppet friendly to Israel. The people who hold the
important positions in Bush's government have frankly stated this position
over and over.

For example, a decade ago in 1996 a group of American neoconservatives who
have comprised much of the sub-cabinet in the Bush administration wrote that
Israel could gain American sympathy by blaming aggression on Hizbollah,
Syria, and Iran and then seizing the strategic initiative by "engaging
Hizbollah, Syria, and Iran as the principal agents of aggression in
Lebanon."

[http://www.newamericancentury.org]

First, however, Iraq would have to be taken out. The first focus, said the
neocons, should be "on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq – an
important Israeli strategic objective in its own right."

Gentle reader, does it not strike you as strange that US citizens, most of
whom have held presidential appointments in the Bush administration, are so
concerned to plan how Israel can draw upon US blood and treasure to achieve
Israel's objectives in the Middle East?

We certainly have to hand it to Israel and its American neoconsevative
agents. They have succeeded on entirely false pretenses in launching two
wars in the Middle East and now they have prepared the ground for a general
conflagration.

Who is to stop them? The Condi Rice State Department? Be serious.

The Democratic Party? What a laugh!

The power mad Republicans who have sold their souls?

The Christian Evangelicals who believe the destruction of huge numbers of
people in the Middle East is the lead up to "the Rapture" in which they will
be wafted up to Heaven?

The UN Security Council, where the US never fails to veto any resolution or
sanction against Israel?

The US and Israel haven't the troops needed to defeat and occupy Syria,
Hizbollah and Iran with conventional forces. Pentagon documents have
described two ways in which the Middle East can be secured for Israel. One
is the use of nuclear weapons. The other is the destruction of all
infrastructure – power plants, water and sewage systems, hospitals, schools,
roads, bridges, ports, and a reduction of much housing to rubble by powerful
conventional bombs. In other words, an air war that never ends.

Most Americans are incapable of identifying their own US Representative and
Senators. Everything they "know" about the Middle East comes from Israeli
propaganda: Israel is the innocent victim, and all Arabs are terrorists with
suicide bombs.

America is being led by a handful of traitors into participating in "regime
change" that might succeed or might dethrone our bought and paid for puppets
in Egypt, Pakistan, Jordan and Saudi Arabia. If Pakistan were to fall to
Islamist forces, Muslims would have a nuclear capability as a counterpart to
Israel's and America's.

Muslims have many reasons to hate us for generations of oppression and
interference in their internal affairs. As Iraq has proven, it is not easy
to break their spirit. Out-gunned and out-manned, they still resist,
motivated by anger and pride.

Many Americans may think that "ragheads" mean nothing to them. But when $200
oil means Americans cannot commute to their jobs in their gas-guzzlers from
their far-flung suburbs, or Russia and China intervene because
American-Israeli interests conflict with their own, the world becomes a
different place for inattentive, uninvolved, complicit Americans.

----------------------------------------