Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Canadian Political Free-for-All -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (9468)	7/16/2006 2:02:11 PM
From: Ichy Smith	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 37271

It is a naive mistake, for example, to blame the Lebanese government for not disarming Hezbollah Good post. I think Harper was too quick to jump on the Israel has a right to defend itself Bandwagon vis a vis Lebanon.. It is a different situation than Gaza. So what should Israel have done? Who should the responsibility for the safety of Israelis fall upon? It is easy to say, that faced with hundreds of missiles, Israel should have taken a path of peace. BUT, faced with an enemy whose stated objection is the destruction of their country, I think Israel is being rather restrained. If the heads of the governments of Syria and Iran are working to support the Hezbollah and supplying the weapons and some of the troops that are being used then I submit that the heads of their governments are legitimate targets of the Israeli military, and should they be supporting terrorism, then they should be subject to execution.