Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (295176)	7/16/2006 8:02:32 PM
From: Taro	Respond to of 1573439

..in its final form, communism... by final form you mean "true" communism, right? Which then is supposed to be something good, as opposed to Stalin, Mao and Fidel I may assume. Or by "final form", do you allure to some paradise still to come? Possibly even on US soil after your "Endsieg" of the dems or what? More from the same drawer... ...true socialism/communism ever practiced.. So here is what beats me: You dems, libs and other dreamer socialists always compare National Socialism as put to work by Hitler with some fuzzy but oh-so-wonderful theories how different his regime was as compared to a yet to come ideal Marxist Utopia somewhere. Of course any Utopia knocks the sox off any real case from history. That's the definition of Utopia. But the facts are, that where Stalin was a true socialist in indeed nationalizing the private corporations and farms, so was Hitler when it came to caring about his own German small citizens and their welfare. In this department, Stalin, however, was very far from Marx theories, just like Hitler, who rapidly run out of time to nationalize the economy when he prematurely got dragged into a war with the British and their allies. Hitler was just as much a socialist as Stalin or Mao. Just deal with it. Taro