Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (295319)	7/23/2006 5:10:13 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1572507

Z, Well, to have someone in the White House that isn't actively trying to take apart Social Security and isn't going into ridiculous wars, but isn't particularly competent would certainly be better than Bush. Exactly my point. You never agreed with Iraq and you think Social Security is fine the way it is. Hence you'll take a David Dinkins or an Al Sharpton over George W. Bush. Yes. Again, why is that so hard for you to understand? Thankfully, there are better choices. However, if the choice was between Dinkins and Bush, Dinkins would get my vote. Bush is the worst president in the history of the US. Hence, ABB! [tm Ten] Its very simple. It even has a kind of flow to it. ;-) Clever guy that rove! [tm Ten]