Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mao II who wrote (65559)	7/18/2006 4:30:58 PM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

How about Cunningham, taking bribes from military contractors and then taking it up the ass too? What does that teach you about republicans and morality? Another thing that needs to be stressed, is that no children would have ever needed to know anything about blow jobs if it were not for the over zealous republicans that wanted to nail Clinton...even if the entire nation's children would have to learn about blow jobs on nation wide TV. A lot of sex goes on in Washington, republicans and democrats. But it was the republicans that chose to make it an issue. Blame the republicans for making it their business to investigate and drag Clinton's dirty laundry in front of the noses or our children. Then they have the gaul to blame the fact that the children had to learn about BJ's in this fashion because of Clinton! Nope, the republicans traded political points for sex-ed lessons for my children...and I will never forget that. It is ironic that they also are against sex-ed in the schools. Perhaps they could do exposes on all politicians in Civics class and that would double as sex-ed. That might help reduce school budgets. LOL! COL!

To: Mao II who wrote (65559)	7/18/2006 4:38:02 PM
From: atm_prophet	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 93284

O' Reilly wasn't the President and didn't run for public office (Mr. dipsht). And even though girls are aware of sex does not mean that I want to promote the concept that oral sex is not sex with my daughters. If you play with fire you get burnt. So if you open that door how much further until intercourse is the journey. Not far. Semantics, for me and my home, oral sex is sex. If it is a minor thing, than why not allow your wife to not have sex with your friends? See what an idiotic argument you are trying to defend. MORON!!!!! P.S. and the reason for the is not to violate TOS ... MORON! You sure you don't work for the ACLU?