SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (66341)7/18/2006 11:22:24 PM
From: yard_man  Respond to of 110194
 
I don't dispute that larger concentrations of CO2 trap heat -- my suspiscion is that chart looks "too good."

i.e. someone saw some things they were looking for in order to get such a good correlation between the two ... something in the way the data is taken correlates it, they don't have good significantly different ways to measure the supposed two variables they are investigating --



To: CalculatedRisk who wrote (66341)7/18/2006 11:26:29 PM
From: Claude Cormier  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
What about the theory that vapor water causes more greenhouse effects than CO2 and that the sun has been responsible for more vapor water to be released into the upper layer at various times in our history.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News