Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: atm_prophet who wrote (65657)	7/19/2006 12:00:36 PM
From: American Spirit	Respond to of 93284

Kerry did not say that. Kerry and Gore both are privately (and publicly) on record as stating they were ripped off. I know this from personal conversations with their righthand men. Kerry has several lawsuits going in Ohio to try and find out what happened to his votes. He's now 100% sure the eledction stolen. So why did he concede? 1) A candidate must have concrete evidence on election day that election fraud occured and Kerry didn't get that evidence until weeks or months after the election. Remember he needed proof that Bush had stolen at least 55,000 votes. That took awhile to get as the GOP refused to investigate. 2) Kerry follows in a long line of politicians who obey the unwritten rule to be a good sport. So he does not feel he should be the one to cry foul. 3) Once Bush is sworn in, it's too late anyway. But Kerry now wants the truth to come out. Not only about the election fraud in Ohio and other states, but who was really behind the smearvets campaign. Hint: it wasn't vets.