Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (24548)	7/19/2006 10:22:47 PM
From: Rambi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541340

They don't work 680 hours a week or anywhere close to it Obviously you haven't been a stay at home mom. I would have been double and triple billing, with enormous amounts of overtime pay. The point is that if you are going to ask what is unfair about taking out what each put in, you have got to have some way of assessing what WAS put in. And frankly, I don't think it's as ridiculous as you say. The reason I was insured when the boys were small was to replace me with the housekeeper, nanny, cook, laundress, financial manager if I keeled over from doing those 17 jobs. And did I ever tell you how I was in labor 457 hours one night?