Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sageyrain who wrote (57577)	7/20/2006 4:06:26 PM
From: Canuck Dave	Respond to of 313092

You're right, and only the drill will ultimately tell the story. Some basic geology has obviously been done on the site, so there should be some clues as to the stratigraphy. I haven't taken the time to decipher the charts as to tip angle, and in fact, it's not an area of expertise for me. Anybody taken a close enough look to offer a reasonable interpretation of the veins? CD

To: sageyrain who wrote (57577)	7/20/2006 7:31:39 PM
From: russet	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 313092

The dip angle of the mineralization has not been determined yet. The veinlets orientation they are talking about may have nothing to do with the orientation of the dip of the mineralization. They believe there was multiple mineralizing events. There are not enough drill holes to determine anything about true width yet, or how the deposit was created. Where did you get your degree in geology. I have some courses from University of Waterloo. Like all stock plays, this is a big gamble and can go either way. Informed geologists are coming out all over the map on this one from under 5 million to over 10 million oz Au but no one knows for sure. The guy who says they do is the ignorant one. Ask teevee or Eric Charters if you don't believe me, both are accredited geologists I believe.