SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mishedlo who wrote (66526)7/20/2006 6:03:03 PM
From: Perspective  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
Mish, the 5 vs. 30 indeed steepened. Look at these:

finance.yahoo.com

EDIT: Whoops - I see that what you're concerned with is the steepening in the 6 month - 5 year range, which is probably the most relevant since it indicates market opinion on Fed policy.

BC



To: mishedlo who wrote (66526)7/20/2006 6:04:42 PM
From: Perspective  Respond to of 110194
 
$OSX - Nobody seems to be paying attention to this on the Ewave thread, so I think I'll bring it here. H&S on oils is getting a test right now:

============

Watching that potential H&S in the oils. Some leading issues there clearly breaking down. If oil falls apart, that is not market bullish. That would be sure sign of a recession dead ahead.

stockcharts.com
stockcharts.com

This one has already given up some important support levels, including trendline support:

stockcharts.com
stockcharts.com

I'm not quite gutsy enough to fade the oils yet, but failure of $OSX would have me lean further toward the notion of (at least) a recession and cyclical bear.

BC



To: mishedlo who wrote (66526)7/21/2006 10:11:34 AM
From: orkrious  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 110194
 
That is my take.
Send him this post.


Here's Heinz' response:


Mish is right insofar, as the important thing to watch is the very short term yields (FF-rate, 3-month bills) vs. the very long term ones (10, 30 yr.). true, the curve has steepened between the belly (5yr. ) and the long end yesterday, but in terms of FF rate/3-month bills vs. 10/30yr. it remains in inversion - in fact a pretty pronounced inversion. this remains a short term depressing factor for gold stocks.
now, it is important to remember that from the point in time when the curve first inverts, to the point in time when the economy weakens and the resulting decline in demand for credit begins to push ST yields down faster than LT ones, prompting a renewed rate cut cycle, there is usually a 6-9 month lag.
in that sense, we are not very far from the point when the reversal to steepening is bound to happen.
the question is really if the gold sector will attempt to discount this event in advance. this imo depends partly on how weak the rest of the stock market is between now and then. the most recent example we have is the late 2000 low point in the gold sector, and that occurred concurrently with the yield curve's turning point - there was no discounting in advance.
however, in the meantime, the relationship between gold stocks and the yield curve is much more widely known, and this imo opens up the possibility of a degree of advance discounting. this is also why the gold sector tends to be especially strong on days when speculation that the rate hike cycle is ending strengthens.

anyway, the chart to watch is the 30 year yield/3-month t-bill yield ratio. this keeps things simple, and i note this chart exhibits a number of divergences by now that suggest steepening is not too far away. check it out on stock charts ( $TYX:$IRX is the symbol you must put in).



To: mishedlo who wrote (66526)7/21/2006 10:52:27 AM
From: John Vosilla  Respond to of 110194
 
'A steepening yield curve is good for gold. Not a steeping inversion'

Yes. It collapsed even in 73-74 right before it's greatest bull market ever. Something to look at in the stagflation vs deflation debate that apparently cannot be resolved until the fed starts another pump job during the next downturn.