SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: steve harris who wrote (295999)7/20/2006 10:39:09 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573020
 
For those interested in whose side the Lebanese army is on...I found this on their website. It appears they view Hezbollah and Syria as "assets". No wonder Israel rung their bell.

You are a lying sack of s......that highlighted paragraph that you posted was describing the situation at one point in Lebanon's history. This is what they are saying now should be the ulimate solution.......a very reasoned security plan for the region:

"There are some requisites and basic criteria that should be considered to insure the success of any new regional security architecture:

1. Establishment of a stable government in Iraq with all the necessary military and police forces to insure stability and security internally and along the borders with its neighbors. U.S. military bases in Iraq, though desirable, would have drawbacks on future policy.
2. Provision of a new mechanism to relaunch Arab-Israeli peace process on all tracks. Let it be “a comprehensive peace plan for a comprehensive peace” through a call for a Madrid II conference. (29) The future of the Middle East must be built around “one single common challenge: peace. This is true for the Middle East, this is true in Iraq.”(30) Such a process is a first step toward reducing anti-Americanism, containing extremism and terror, regaining close contact with community conscience and promoting political and religious moderation.
3. A regional framework that involves Iran necessitates a change in the confrontational environment between the U.S. and Iran. This could be achieved through active diplomacy in matters related to all issues pending – to include the Iranian nuclear program, terrorism, and the peace process. The U.S. must put up with Iran as a first step toward constructing a regional security framework.
4. The United States has an important role to play in the establishment of the regional framework; however, this task should not lead to a new “made in America pact.” Such a process would draw popular feelings and suspicions against it.
Gulf Security System."


The truth is you and Israel are bullies by nature.