SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (78193)7/22/2006 8:49:28 PM
From: SkywatcherRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
Senator Reid: Iraq Devolves Into "Civil War"
By Dana Bash
CNN News

Thursday 20 July 2006

Democratic leader will try to revive Senate debate on Iraq.

Washington - Declaring that he believes the situation in Iraq has devolved into a civil war, Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid said Thursday he plans to try to bring the war back up for debate on the Senate floor.

The Nevada Democrat said he has been "somewhat gingerly approaching this.... No longer. There is a civil war going on in Iraq. In the last two months, more than 6,000 Iraqis have been killed. That's averaging more than 100 a day being killed in Iraq and we need to make sure there is a debate on this."

Republicans questioned why Reid wants to go over old ground and were ready to highlight the divisions among Democrats once again.

"Talk about your bad summer reruns," said Eric Ueland, Chief of Staff to Majority Leader Bill Frist, "if they want to do that we'll go to the mats," he said.

Ueland threatened that Republicans would offer a proposal from Sen. John Kerry, D-Massachusetts, which calls for U.S. troops to come home by July of 2007.

That plan garnered only 13 Democratic votes in June, and illustrated the party's divide over the issue.

Republicans offered Kerry's plan before he did in June as well.

A Republican aide also warned that another debate about the Iraq war could prevent the Senate from completing work on necessary military spending bills.

Bob Stevenson, a Frist spokesman, told CNN, "We need to get the defense appropriations bill done and I would hope they would cooperate in getting the appropriations bill done to fund our troops, rather than engaging in partisan political games."

A "Cut and Run" Strategy?

Last month Senate Democrats offered two Iraq resolutions centering on U.S. troop withdrawal, and during several days of highly partisan debate, Republicans accused them of advocating a "cut and run" strategy.

Senate Democratic leaders call Iraq the top issue on voters' minds this election year and say they want to continue talking about it in Congress, especially since the situation appears to be deteriorating.

"The American people find it hard to believe that we can continue with our daily business here ignoring the obvious, which is the daily situation is getting worse," said Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin.

"It is more dangerous, we're still losing American lives and the Iraqis have not stepped up to defend their own country," the Illinois Democrat said. "That is a fact, and that will be a fact that people will remember in November."

Tactical Error?

Some Democratic strategists told CNN at the time that Democratic senators made a tactical error in allowing June's Iraq debate to focus on troop withdrawal, an issue that divides the party, instead of playing up what they call administration blunders and lack of accountability from a GOP Congress.

Durbin noted that 39 Democrats voted for a non-binding resolution that would have urged the president to begin a phased troop withdrawal this year, but, he said, "Republicans said nothing. They had no response."

"We know, and they (Republicans) know, that this is the number one issue on the minds of people across America. When they say they want significant change in America, and you ask them what they're talking about, their answer is Iraq," Durbin said.

Democratic leaders say they do not yet know what kind of resolution or resolutions they plan to offer, but they hope to come up with what Reid called "lots of" Iraq-related measures the last week of July, when the Senate debates the defense appropriations bill.

Senate rules governing a funding bill limit their options.

A part of their strategy appears to be challenging Republicans, especially those facing tough re-election campaigns, on whether they will remain squarely behind the president, as they were during June's debate.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Go to Original

Crackdown Yields Little Security in Baghdad
By Julian E. Barnes
The Los Angeles Times

Friday 21 July 2006

The city saw an average of 25 attacks a day over 35 days of extra searches, patrols and checkpoints.

Baghdad - More than a month after the beginning of a highly publicized security crackdown and the killing of militant leader Abu Musab Zarqawi, the number of daily attacks in Baghdad has actually increased.

Iraqi and U.S. forces began stepping up patrols, creating new checkpoints and conducting more searches June 14. But the initiative, Operation Together Forward, has not reduced the number of attacks in the capital, according to statistics released by U.S. military forces Thursday.

In the 101 days before the crackdown, an average of 23.8 attacks occurred daily. In the first 35 days of the operation, the average was 25.2 attacks a day.

The failure of the crackdown to decrease the violence is yet another sign of the sectarian conflict that has buffeted this city. Continuing violence across Iraq prompted Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani, the nation's highest-ranking Shiite Muslim cleric, to issue a rare public statement Thursday that urged Iraqis to stop attacks against civilians.

"I repeat my call today to all Iraqis of different sects and ethnicities to realize the extent of the danger threatening their country's future and confront it side by side," Sistani wrote.

In the statement, Sistani called on those setting off car bombs and carrying out executions to stop, and to instead start talking with the government.

Prime Minister Nouri Maliki and U.S. military leaders have said their priority is securing Baghdad, increasing residents' sense of safety by eliminating sectarian militias, death squads and insurgent fighters.

Officials tried to put the best face on the statistics. Army Maj. Gen. William B. Caldwell IV, chief spokesman for the U.S. military in Iraq, said at a news conference Thursday that an upswing in sectarian violence in the last few days had driven the averages higher. In the first month of the operation, he said, the number of daily attacks was about the same as during the previous 101 days, at 23.7 a day.

"While the last five days or so should not be an indicator of the Baghdad security plan overall, neither can they be brushed aside," Caldwell said. "And again, we will do whatever it takes to bring down the level of violence here in Baghdad."

The June death of Zarqawi, the leader of Al Qaeda in Iraq, had led some to hope that the power of foreign militants here would diminish. Although the effectiveness of Zarqawi's organization after his death has yet to be tested, it is clear that much of the violence in Baghdad is unrelated to foreign militants. Most of the recent killing in the capital involves Iraqi Sunni Arab insurgents trading attacks with Shiite death squads.

On Monday, the bodies of 32 Sunni Arab men were found in Baghdad, apparently the victims of Shiite death squads. Those killings were followed by a suicide bombing that killed 57 day laborers in a Shiite neighborhood of the southern town of Kufa.

Such fighting has led prominent Sunni Arab and Shiite leaders to say their country is gripped by an undeclared civil war.

The violence continued Thursday morning with a car bomb that killed three and injured 10 in downtown Baghdad. In the afternoon, a second car bomb killed two people and injured seven in the Shula neighborhood.

Kirkuk, a northern Iraqi city where ethnic tensions have risen along with the sectarian fighting in Baghdad, was also the scene of a car bombing. The device exploded near the government building downtown, killing five and wounding 19.

The U.S. military confirmed that it had launched a joint operation with Iraqi security forces in two small cities west of Kirkuk. Soldiers from the Army's 101st Airborne Division and the Iraqi security forces surrounded the town of Hawija, while a joint force entered the market at the center of the city, military officials announced.

Thirty-one Iraqi soldiers have been killed in Hawija in the last five weeks, the military said.

Iraqi army officials had announced a joint operation in the Rashad area, also west of Kirkuk, on Wednesday.

The U.S. military statistics showed that in the first four weeks of the security crackdown in Baghdad, attacks had fallen in seven of the city's 10 districts. Caldwell said much of the recent violence occurred in a few neighborhoods, which experience about 41% of the city's killings.

"We should note the extreme concentration of attacks in roughly five areas around the city," Caldwell said.

"This contrasts to the swaths of Baghdad experiencing somewhat relative peace. Hundreds of thousands of Baghdadis live a regular life day in and day out, unmarred by the violent attacks on civilians in the most troubled areas."

The security operation in Baghdad has taken a heavy toll on Iraqi police and soldiers. U.S. military officials said that 92 Iraqi police and soldiers had been killed and 444 injured in the first four weeks of the operation.

Maj. Gen. Abdul Aziz Mohammed Jassim, spokesman for the Iraqi Defense Ministry, said that one of the biggest problems the security operation faced was armed groups posing as Iraqi police and army units. "Those groups disrupt any security plan, no matter how good it is," he said.

Caldwell blamed the increased violence on fighters and weapons being brought into Baghdad from other parts of Iraq in an attempt to undermine the security crackdown.

"We have seen the movement of terrorist elements into the Baghdad area," Caldwell said. "If Prime Minister Maliki succeeds in Baghdad, he'll be able to succeed in Iraq. So they will do everything they can to in fact stop that."

Caldwell suggested that the military was considering incorporating elements of the strategy used in Ramadi into the Baghdad security plan. U.S. forces have ringed Ramadi with checkpoints and built combat outposts in troublesome parts of the city.

However, Ramadi is a city of 400,000, and conducting a similar operation in Baghdad, a city of more than 5 million, would probably require far more troops. There are about 42,500 Iraqi security troops and 7,200 U.S. military personnel in Baghdad participating in the operation.

"As far as troop numbers, every option is on the table at this point," Caldwell said.

For Baghdad residents, patience with the new government is already wearing thin. Many say the security crackdown has created long lines and checkpoints but done nothing to reduce the threat of being kidnapped or killed.

"If security cannot be maintained, then there will never be any stability," said Talib Kadhum Jawad, 60, the owner of a currency exchange. "Everybody is targeted now."

--------

Times staff writers Shamil Aziz, Suhail Affan and Raheem Salman contributed to this report