SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JDN who wrote (174312)7/21/2006 6:25:21 PM
From: MrLucky  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794502
 
Interesting thought. Do you think Iran would use that as an excuse to attack Israel? Of course, it's no secret they have plenty of their own in Hezbollah already.

Reminds me of the Korean "police action" when the Soviets were directly involved with NK.



To: JDN who wrote (174312)7/21/2006 6:33:19 PM
From: steve harris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794502
 
Peace came to Egypt and Israel; I think it will take an Arab country like Egypt or Jordan to join Israel in the fight against terrorists hellbent on killing.

Egypt, Jordan, Israel wipes Syria and Hezbollah off the face of the earth. Anwar Sadat was assassinated for making peace with Israel.



To: JDN who wrote (174312)7/21/2006 10:34:48 PM
From: Stevefoder  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794502
 
USA to attack Syria

Sounds like a good way to expand a war where it could be out of our control.

Say the Syrian government did collapse. Then what?

Who would control the government of Syria? Could we control that?

War is often necessary, but you never really know what the ultimate effect is.

We still are playing out the effects of WWII (e.g Israel's creation, Korean peninsula split)


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News