Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sageyrain who wrote (57695)	7/22/2006 8:36:54 PM
From: Land Shark	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 313075

This guy is feigning technical expertise to deliberately mislead and shake investor confidence. He's got an automatic conflict of interest in his faint hope of getting his stinko bids filled.

To: sageyrain who wrote (57695)	7/23/2006 10:11:04 PM
From: russet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 313075

Your model likely assumes the gold veins are consistent between drillholes and perhaps over wider widths than I would. I wouldn't make that assumption with so few holes. I believe the individual veins will pinch and swell and the width of the envelope of veins in the mineralized block may diminish quickly in the open directions so the waste rock will dilute the true grades considerably. I would cut your resource estimates in half. Optimism, pessimism,...two conflicts. The prudent gambler keeps his freebies and puts in stink bids. How is that conflicted?:-)