Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dayuhan who wrote (192692)	7/23/2006 1:38:20 AM
From: geode00	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

You are failing to understand the problem. Go back and do some basic research before throwing in your two cents. Although I have provided you with sufficient information for you to draw the correct conclusion, you have failed to do so. I do not wish to repeat my last post on this subject so I suggest that you read the information again and note the dates. Then go and look at the dates of the 'elections' and also the press coverage on who or what was running for office and how they were campaigning. Then review the Sunni participation, the 'Constitution' and its required timeline and then the US pushing the Sunnis back into the process. The 'administration' is not a single entity. The many entities, including the neocons, who made up the administration at that time had their own agendas. I just covered this in the privatisation of oil fields argument between the Neocons and BigOil. BigOil would want to extract, over time, the largest profit from a limited resource while Wolfowitz apparently wanted to destroy OPEC for the sake of Israel. Bush would side with BigOil which is, after all, part of his self-proclaimed BASE. What, exactly, is my ideology? Define it since it upsets you so.