To: Bill Keating who wrote (2711 ) 7/24/2006 4:58:34 PM From: pcstel Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3386 By "your agenda" I mean why are you so passionate about companies you don't own and don't plan to own? You like doing good deeds for poor, misled anonymous investors? No one ever said that I don't plan to own any of these companies. As a matter of fact. If you check my record. I usually end up owning ownership in some of these companies. Of course, I do so by buying the secured debt at deeply distressed levels upon the BK filings. Companies like Iridium, Globalstar, Loral, Leap, etc. The real money to be made is in the secured debt at the right time. Not some foolish equity investment. The difference between myself and most novice equity investors is simple. I just read the numbers for what they are. I have quite a bit of experience in the Telecom subscriber business. And I called these SDAR companies ZERO's before most anyone here knew what SDAR's were. Now maybe you call this an "agenda". And maybe I consider it doing "Good Deeds". I can tell you that I have received more than one e-mail from investors that I have saved their retirements after providing actual data that finally got them off the Kool-Aid. You see.. I have no emotional attachment to these stocks. I can't count the number of times people have told me that "I don't need saving". However, when they do end up being a Bagholder. They hold me responsible, instead of all of their pumping buddiez™. On the other hand. I would have to disagree with you on your monopoly concept. The regulatory bodies involved would never approve such a concept. The path of least resistance is a reorganization. Everyone gets their clock cleaned except the secured. The company continues on in it's daily operations as though nothing has happened, but the common, unsecured, and in many cases the preferred are eliminated. Only the secured remain. Now, with a fresh lease on life, they are off to the races with their competition with a much lower debt burden. Looking ahead to both of these companies post re-organization. You will end up seeing the auto manufactures will end up with stakes in both companies. The last thing these companies can afford is to shake the confidence of the OEM partners. So you can be sure that they will carry the OEM's through the process with post reorg ownership stakes for each. I know the faithful don't like the contrarian views. But, both of these companies are in deep trouble. Just my opinion, PCSTEL