Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Honey_Bee who wrote (22458)	7/24/2006 12:21:05 AM
From: dijaexyahoo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

elan quatro said: <<I may be able to offer insight into the latest Brinker claim. But, could someone please tell me the exact verbiage he used?>> --Thanks for asking. Here is the EXACT verbiage: "Marketimer currently is ranked number one for long-term stock market timing by the two major rating services, Hulbert Financial Digest and Timer Digest." honey said: <<Dija...Bob Brinker was NOT rated number one in any category for any length of time. Why do you keep ignoring that fact? Or are you accusing Kirk and me of lying about something that is easily verifiable?>> --No. I am NOT accusing anyone of lying. I am only wondering if you are overlooking something, and I suspect you don't REALLY want to find out that you are wrong. I have asked this question several times, and, not surprisingly, I have yet to receive an answer. I am sure that I never will: If Bob Brinker was not ranked number #1 for long-term stock market timing for 5, 10 and 15 years, WHO IN THE WORLD WAS?????? Note to stockalot: I used the March HFD as an example. I do not know if Hulbert ranked brinker #1 for long-term stock market timing. I assume he did do it in some recent issue, but I don't KNOW it. I was just saying to kirk that if Hulbert did do it (for example) in the March issue, that would still qualify as "current," since no rankings have been published for that category since then. Kirk was taking issue with the word "current," and that is what I was responding to. Sorry for the confusion.