Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jon Koplik who wrote (143900)	7/27/2006 6:18:35 PM
From: Jon Koplik	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

"Wrap-up" on "gap" idiocy / "phony" trades ................................ If you combine : ************************************************************* Message 22644317 Message Boards \| Communications : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) To: Jon Koplik who wrote (143141) 7/21/2006 10:20:33 AM From: Jon Koplik 143832 of 144004 (stock price chart) "gap" idiots -- today, we have a "gap" that would force QCOM to rally. Therefore, it appears there is no tendency at all (so far) to "fill the gap." (QCOM needs to rally to (a still ridiculously low price of) $35.58 or $35.59 to "fill the gap.") (Right now, we are around $34.15, with a high on the day of $35.15 ) Jon. ********************************************************** And : ------------------------------------------------------------- Message 22652137 Message Boards \| Communications : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) To: Jon Koplik who wrote (143016) 7/24/2006 1:02:55 PM From: Jon Koplik 143900 of 144004 Today, another phony new "high for the day" ... "introduced" into the price data. Real high was around $35.42 Phony high shows as $35.59 So, our decline from the "high" looks worse than the "truth." Jon. -------------------------------------------------------------- You will see (amazingly) ... that the "phony" trade on 7/24/06 (which never actually took place, I believe) (and, was never corrected, unlike another "phony" trade I pointed out here : Message 22568456 ...) Filled the stupid "gap"** (which then may have given the "green light" for the resumption of more downward movement in the price of QCOM. (QCOM went down over $1.00 the next day (7/25/06), even though that day was clearly an "up" day for stocks in general). (paranoid) Jon.