Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Math Junkie who wrote (22479)	7/24/2006 6:04:46 PM
From: Kirk ©	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

"I don't put much stock in private evidence, because I figure if it's any good, then it should be good enough to stand up to public scrutiny." Then you have not had people lie about you then report you for spamming when you post links to your forum where the proof exists. They actually got my account deleted at Yahoo and I had to make a whole new one. You ever wonder why they lie about me so much on Yahoo and I ignore them? There is your answer. It is a game to harass me. I am sure you are aware of this... but the others have had time to read F451's post that shows them your own words were some of my "undocumented proof" that dija was crying about and you failed to step forward and admit YOU were one of the many who posted the information. You just showed you have a TERRIBLE memory and should not be relied on for anything of substance you post OR you showed you are willing to let dija lie about me and harass me while you have the data to prove what I say was true. Shame on you.

To: Math Junkie who wrote (22479)	7/24/2006 8:00:46 PM
From: dijaexyahoo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

math said to kirk: <<As for your other claims, I just looked back at some of the posts involved, and I can see why you didn't want to post the links. It's really not a slam dunk for either side. A lot of it is in what interpretation one puts on the things that were said. I think you're exaggerating what he said, but I think you were both losing your tempers.>> --Math, thanks for posting those links. As you say, it's very obvious why kirk has never posted any links regarding this issue, and it is equally obvious why he has never told us what "bad names" I called him. I do appreciate your objectivity, but I wonder just what you mean when you say "it's not a slam dunk for either side." Are you saying that a fair and objective person could actually read kirk's posts and my posts on that board and come away with the belief that kirk was justified in asking me to leave?