SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (296642)7/24/2006 9:53:57 PM
From: Proud Deplorable  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572571
 
July 25, 2006 No.1211

Hizbullah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah: I Told Lebanese Political Leaders We Would Abduct Israeli Soldiers

On July 24, 2006, Al-Jazeera TV aired an interview with Hizbullah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah.

The following are excerpts from the interview: [1]

TO VIEW THIS CLIP, VISIT: memritv.org.

We Did Not Expect the Arab Regimes "To Participate in Spilling the Blood of the Victim, and to Provide Cover for the Crimes of the Hangman"

Hassan Nasrallah: "The international community has never been with us, for us to claim that 'today it is not with us, it is besieging us, abandoning us, and neglecting us.' It has never been with us. On the contrary, it has been against us in the things that matter. For example, we have been on the American terrorism list since... since they began the terrorism list. We were among the first to be included in the terrorism list. Some European countries also include us in their terrorism lists. The position of the international community is clear, and therefore, we are not surprised by the international community, and we have never pinned our hopes on it."

[...]

"As for some of the Arab positions - this is, of course, something new. True. In the past, some of the Arab regimes renounced the resistance and its men. Today, we would accept it if the Arab regimes - I am being very objective and realistic... We would accept it if they were neutral. That's it. In the past, too, we accepted this from them. If you examine the rhetoric of Hizbullah... Maybe the rhetoric of our Palestinian brothers is different, and this is their right, because their circumstances are much harsher than ours. They always attack, accuse, and denounce the regimes and the rulers. This is not part of our rhetoric or writings. Why? Because we have forgotten about them. There is no need for it. If you assume someone exists, you can attack him, but if you feel that he does not exist, by attacking him, you would be aggravating yourself for nothing.

"Once we used to ask the international community to denounce the hangman and to have mercy on the victim. Then we got to the point where we said we would accept it if they denounce the hangman and the victim alike. This has become what we could expect from them. If a resolution denounces both the hangman and the victim - fine. As for the Arab regimes - all we expect from them is to be neutral. And if they do not want to be neutral - brother, let them treat Israel and us equally. We would even accept it if they treat the hangman and the victim equally. But for them to participate in spilling the blood of the victim, and to provide cover for the crimes of the hangman - I tell you that we did not expect this. This was indeed a surprise."

[...]

"I say categorically that the Israeli response to the capturing operation could have been harsh, but limited, if not for the cover provided by the Arabs and international community. It is not that Israel got the green light from America, Ghassan. Israel received an American decision that said: 'Go on and finish that business in Lebanon.'"

[...]

"In addition, some of the Arabs provided a cover, and encouraged Israel to continue the battle. Israel was told that this is a golden and historic opportunity to annihilate the resistance in Lebanon. They don't want to annihilate only the resistance of Hizbullah in Lebanon. They want to annihilate any motivation to conduct resistance in Lebanon, whether by Hizbullah or anyone else. They want to bring the country to a situation in which the word 'resistance' is considered derogatory. Martyr, jihad, wounded, steadfastness, challenge, liberation, freedom, power, honor, nobility, dignity - all these words must be removed from the vocabulary of the Lebanese, from the press, the political writings, from the political thinking, from the popular conscience. This is what Israel is doing. America needs this if it wants to reorganize the region."

[...]

"I Say to the Arab Rulers... Remain Neutral"

Hassan Nasrallah: "I am convinced that even the sons, daughters, and wives of some Arab rulers are with us. But I say to the Arab rulers: I don't want your swords or even your hearts. All I want is for you to leave us alone, as we say in colloquial Lebanese. In other words, remain neutral. We are fine with that. You've said what you said - you can relax now, thank you very much. Today there is a war that was imposed on Lebanon. Its purpose is to eliminate anything to do with the resistance or its fighters in Lebanon, and to punish Lebanon for defeating Israel. The truth is that the goal of the war against Lebanon is to eliminate the Palestinian issue. Everybody knows that the widespread Intifada in Palestine broke out following the victory in Lebanon. What is happening in Palestine is a similar and improved version of the Lebanese model. If today we destroy the Lebanese model, the message to the Palestinians would be that they should despair."

[...]

"The [Lebanese] Government Statement Says That [the Armed Resistance] has the Right to Liberate the Land and the Prisoners"

Hassan Nasrallah: "This thing you asked me about - that I didn't inform or ask [the Lebanese government]...

"First of all, the government statement, on the basis of which we joined the government, says that the Lebanese government adopts the resistance, and its natural right to liberate the land and the prisoners. Okay, how is the resistance supposed to liberate the prisoners? It should go to George Bush? I cannot and will not go to George Bush. When you say 'the right of the resistance,' you are not talking about the foreign ministry. You are talking about the armed resistance, and the government statement says that it has the right to liberate the land and the prisoners. I am a resistance movement. I am armed. That's one thing. This is the government statement, on the basis of which the government won the parliament's vote of confidence.

"Second, during the [Lebanese national] dialogue... Some people are now saying that I did or didn't say certain things... There are recordings. Yes, I did tell them that we are keeping the border calm, because this was our policy. But there are two issues in which we cannot tolerate this calm. I raised four issues. Two issues can bear delays, procrastination, postponement, and reminders. No problem. The first is the continued occupation of the Shab'a Farms. Never mind, we can take our time on this. This is a small and limited piece of land. We will not start a war over the Shab'a Farms. I'm referring to the kind of war we have now. The second issue was the aerial and naval violations [of sovereignty], and even violations by ground forces. We can tolerate this. True, violations of our sovereignty are deplorable. But are we supposed to destroy the world because of it? No. Two issues cannot tolerate any delay. One is the issue of the prisoners, because of the human suffering. The second issue is any attack against civilians. I told them on more than one occasion that we are taking the issue of the prisoners seriously, and that abducting Israeli soldiers is the only way to resolve it. Of course, I said this in a low-key tone. I did not declare in the dialogue: 'In July I will abduct Israeli soldiers.' This is impossible."

"I Told Them [Lebanese Political Leaders] That We Must Resolve the Issue of the Prisoners, and That the Only Way to Resolve it is by Abducting Israeli Soldiers"

Interviewer: "Did you inform them that you were about to abduct Israeli soldiers?"

Hassan Nasrallah: "I told them that we must resolve the issue of the prisoners, and that the only way to resolve it is by abducting Israeli soldiers."

Interviewer: "Did you say this clearly?"

Hassan Nasrallah: "Yes, and nobody said to me: 'No, you are not allowed to abduct Israeli soldiers.' Even if they had told me not to... I'm not defending myself here. I said that we would abduct Israeli soldiers, in meetings with some of the main political leaders in the country. I don't want to mention names now, but when the time comes to settle accounts, I will. They asked: 'If this happens, will the issue of the prisoners be over and done with?' I said that it was logical that it would. And I'm telling you, our estimation was not mistaken. I'm not exaggerating. Anywhere in the world - show me a country, show me an army, show me a war, in which two soldiers, or even civilian hostages, were abducted, and a war was waged against a country - and all for two soldiers. This has never happened throughout history, and even Israel has never done such a thing."

[...]

"If 60-70 people know all the details of an abduction operation, can it possibly be successful? No, it cannot. All the more so if I inform a government, which has 24 ministers, the heads of the three government branches, political forces, and coalitions. When we held the national dialogue, we talked and discussed things, and an hour later, the protocols of the meetings reached the embassies. Do you want me to tell the entire world that I am about to carry out an abduction operation? It's not logical."

[...]

"It is true that I did not inform the Lebanese government, but I did not inform my closest allies either. Syria and Iran did not know. No Syrian or Iranian knew. They did not know, and I did not consult any of them."

[...]

How Can the War Affect the Iranian Nuclear Dossier?

Hassan Nasrallah: "On the Iranian issue... Now there is a war in Lebanon. In one, two, or three months it will end. How long can it possibly last? Once the war is over, in what way will it affect the Iranian nuclear dossier? What effect will it have on it? On the contrary, if this is in any way connected to the Iranian nuclear dossier, the war being waged against Lebanon does not serve its interest. The Americans and the Israelis have always taken into account that if a confrontation breaks out with Iran, Hizbullah might intervene in Iran's favor. So striking Hizbullah now would weaken, rather than strengthen, Iran on the nuclear issue."

[...]

"Hizbullah has Always Placed Lebanese National Interests Above any Other Interest"

Hassan Nasrallah: "Hizbullah has always placed Lebanese national interests above any other interest. During the national dialogue, I said to them: You have known us for 23-24 years. I am ready to tell each and every one of them which battles he has fought - some of them, not all of them... I am ready to tell some of them which battles they have fought for the sake of foreign, rather than Lebanese, interests. Tell me when we, Hizbullah, did anything to Lebanon, or led it into war, for the sake of foreign, rather than Lebanese, interests. They could not give me a single example."

[...]

"Victory in this case does not mean that I will enter and conquer the north of Palestine, and liberate Nahariya, Haifa, and Tiberias. This is not one of our slogans. This is a long process, which pertains to the Palestinians and to the nation. This is another issue. The victory that we are talking about - If the resistance survives, this will be a victory. If its determination is not broken, this will be a victory. If Lebanon is not humiliated, if its honor and dignity remain intact, if Lebanon continues to face all alone the strongest military force in the region, and if it perseveres and refuses to accept any humiliating terms in the settlement of this issue - this will be a victory. If we are not militarily defeated, this will be a victory. As long as a single missile is launched from Lebanon to target the Zionists, as long as a single fighter fires his gun, as long as someone plants an explosive device for the Israelis, this means that the resistance still exists."

[...]

"Today, we Shi'ites are fighting Israel. Our fighting and perseverance ultimately serve our brothers in Palestine, who are Sunni, not Shi'ite. In other words, we, Shi'ites and Sunnis, fight side by side against Israel, which is supported and strengthened by America. I'm telling you that if [Israeli Prime Minister Ehud] Olmert reaches a point at which he says to the Americans, 'I cannot complete this,' Bush will say to him, 'You go on, and if you encounter a problem, I will resolve it for you.' This is what I meant when I talked about 'a battle of the nation,' and I saw [on TV] that you commented on this. I am not fighting on behalf of the nation. But I say that the outcome of the battle that Hizbullah is fighting in Lebanon, for better or worse, is an outcome for the nation. Defeat in Lebanon is defeat for the nation, and victory in Lebanon is victory for the nation, just like in 2000."

[...]

"For 23 years, we have been talking to our people, motivating them, talking about martyrdom, the honor of martyrdom, and the place of the martyrs. Do the Zionists, or those who encourage them, believe that I, or anyone in the Hizbullah leadership, fears martyrdom? We love martyrdom. We take precautions in order to prevent Israel from making any gains. But on the personal level, and as a personal aspiration, each and every one of us hopes to be destined to martyrdom at the hands of those people, the killers of the prophets and the messengers, and most hostile to the believers, as it says in the Koran."




To: Brumar89 who wrote (296642)7/24/2006 9:55:28 PM
From: Proud Deplorable  Respond to of 1572571
 
July 21, 2006 No.1210

Iranian Parliament Speaker: The Blood of Khomeini Rages in Nasrallah's Veins; The Confrontation is Not Only in Lebanon, But Deep Inside Occupied Palestine and Within the Range of the Lion Cubs of Hizbullah… No Place in Israel Will Be Safe

The following are excerpts from a speech given by Iranian Parliament Speaker Gholam-Ali Haddad 'Adel, which aired on the Iranian News Channel (IRINN) on July 18, 2006.

TO VIEW THIS CLIP: memritv.org .

Gholam-Ali Haddad 'Adel: "England, and then America, wished to have control over the Islamic world, to prevent Muslim unity, and to have control of the oil resources in the Middle East. Therefore, following World War II, they established an artificial, false, and fictitious state called Israel in this region.

"They established a political party, and supported the Zionists, claiming this was support for the Jews of the world. They mobilized the racist Zionists, who are not accepted even by many Jews. They came to Palestine, and under the pretext of wrongs supposedly done to them during World War II, they carried out terrorism, conspiracies, massacres, and bloodshed in this region.

"The indigenous Muslim people of Palestine and the Arabs of the region have been here for over 1,400 years, since the advent of Islam, and have their civilization and culture. They drove them out of this region with massacres. They turned them into refugees and tent dwellers. They made them homeless, dispersed in various countries. The Western governments supported them, exerted influence in the U.N., and created this fictitious state.

"They lied, exaggerated, and fabricated events, in order to present their unjustified deeds as justified. This shows the depth of the animosity and rancor that America, England, and the supporters of Israel harbor towards the Muslims and the Islamic world."

[...]

"America talks about democracy and the rule of the people, and claims that the vote of the people should be respected - but by means of the plundering Zionist regime, it wants to take revenge upon the Palestinian people for voting Hamas in the elections."

[...]

"Today, the peoples have awakened. The Muslims have awakened and are facing you. As you have seen, they are facing you in Lebanon, and so far you have not dared to set foot on Lebanese soil."

[...]

"Today, nobody in the Islamic countries is rolling out the red carpet for you. Today, the land of Palestine is painted red with your contemptible blood."

Crowd: "Allah Akbar.

"Allah Akbar.

"Allah Akbar.

"Khamenei is the leader."

Gholam-Ali Haddad 'Adel: "Today, the confrontation is not only within the borders of Lebanon. It is taking place deep within your land. Today, your flourishing cities in the north of Israel… of occupied Palestine are within the range of fire of the fighters and lion cubs of Hizbullah. Today, Haifa and Tiberias are within Hizbullah's range of fire. No place in Israel will be safe."

Crowd: "Allah Akbar.

"Allah Akbar.

"Allah Akbar.

"Khamenei is the leader.

"Death to those who oppose the rule of the jurisprudent.

"Death to America.

"Death to England..."

Gholam-Ali Haddad 'Adel: "Today is the day you will flee occupied Palestine. You must return to your homes."

Crowd: "Allah Akbar.

"Allah Akbar.

"Allah Akbar.

"Khamenei is the leader."

Gholam-Ali Haddad 'Adel: "Our slogan and the slogan of the Islamic world is: Everyone should return to his own home."

Crowd: "Allah Akbar.

"Allah Akbar.

"Allah Akbar."

Gholam-Ali Haddad 'Adel: "The Palestinian refugees should return to the land of their forefathers, and you, who came to Palestine from other countries, should return to your homes too.

"Today is the day of the liberation of Palestine, and the day of resistance. As said by Hassan Nasrallah, this courageous, vigilant, and informed religious scholar, the war has just begun."

[...]

"We say to America, England, and the supporters of Israel in the West: You will not benefit from supporting Israel. You are earning the hostility of 1.5 billion Muslims worldwide, under the pretext of supporting a handful of Zionists, whom you brought and stuck, like a dagger, in the hearts of the Muslims in the Middle East."

Crowd: "No more humiliation.

"No more humiliation.

"No more humiliation."

Gholam-Ali Haddad 'Adel: "The Americans should know that as long as this festering growth remains in the body of the Islamic world, with their support, the Muslims will never, under any circumstances, cease to hate and to oppose America."

Crowd: "Allah Akbar.

"Allah Akbar.

"Allah Akbar."

Gholam-Ali Haddad 'Adel: "The Muslims throughout the world say: Stop your support for Israel, or else don't expect any kind of peace or reconciliation with the Islamic world."

Crowd: "Allah Akbar.

"Allah Akbar.

"Allah Akbar."

[...]

Gholam-Ali Haddad 'Adel: "To Hassan Nasrallah we say: Well done. This religious scholar roars like a lion, and the blood of Imam Khomeini rages in his veins."

Crowd: "Allah Akbar.

"Allah Akbar.

"Allah Akbar."




To: Brumar89 who wrote (296642)7/24/2006 9:57:23 PM
From: Proud Deplorable  Respond to of 1572571
 
July 18, 2006 No.1208

Iran and the Recent Escalation on Israel's Borders (5): Reactions in Iran, Lebanon, and Syria

The conservative daily Kayhan, affiliated with Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, reported today that Sergei Kiriyenko, head of Russia's atomic energy agency, declared that Russia is opening a new center for uranium enrichment in Siberia, which will operate under IAEA's supervision.

Kiriyenko mentioned that the center would allow Iran to develop its nuclear energy industry for civilian purposes.

In an interview on Russian TV, Kiriyenko said that Russia would cooperate with Iran [regarding the nuclear issue] based on two principles: First, Iran's right, as a NPT member, to develop nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, and second, Iran must guarantee that it is not manufacturing any kind of nuclear weapon.

It is noteworthy that this is a recent Russian initiative that calls for establishing a corporation for uranium enrichment in Russia under IAEA supervision. [1]

The following is the fifth dispatch in the series on Iran and the recent escalation on Israel's borders [2]:

IRANIAN REACTIONS

Iranian Leader Ali Khamenei on Iranian TV, July 16: Hizbullah Will Not Be Disarmed

On July 16, 2006, Iranian leader Ali Khamenei gave a speech, aired on Iranian TV. The following are excerpts (translated by MEMRI TV, see: memritv.org )

Khamenei: "The Zionists would like Lebanon to be meat between their teeth, so they could do to it whatever they want, whenever they want.

"Today, the strong arm of the Lebanese resistance and the Lebanese Hizbullah has prevented this nightmare of the Zionists from coming true. This is why the American president says Hizbullah must be disarmed. Yes, of course this is what you want. Of course this is what the Zionists want. But this will not happen.

"The Lebanese people value Hizbullah and the resistance, because they know it is this strong arm that has prevented the Zionists from doing whatever they want, whenever they want, to Lebanon."

Man in crowd: "Hizbullah is victorious. Israel is doomed."

Crowd: "Hizbullah is victorious. Israel is doomed…"

Khamenei: "Well, this is what I am saying too."

Kayhan Editor: The Annihilation of the Zionist Regime is Not Only a Religious and National Duty, but a Universal Human Duty; The Whole World Must Be Made Unsafe for the Zionists, [Including] Their Political and Commercial Centers. This Does Not Require the Governments' Approval

Hossein Shariatmadari, editor of the conservative Iranian daily Kayhan, affiliated with Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, called today (July 17, 2006) in his editorial to "wipe Israel off the map." He said: "There are many signs and portents indicating that 'the fateful day' is coming near. It is possible that this day... has already begun...

"The Muslim peoples and many other peoples think that, in global geopolitics, there is no such thing as the state of Israel, and that the [entity] which presently bears this name is a usurping and rootless state that has imposed its parasitic presence over the region and over Palestine with the support of the arrogant powers. [This entity] invents a new crime every day. It causes men, women, and innocent children to bleed to death, or else deports them from their homeland and turns them into refugees. In light of this 'problem,' which is perfectly obvious, the annihilation of the Zionist regime is not only a religious and national duty, but also a universal human duty, from which no Muslim or free human being can be exempt.

"Comprehensive support for Hamas and Hizbullah, political, logistically, militarily, and through sending combatant forces to this front are the minimal price that the Islamic countries must pay in order to maintain their own security and independence...

"The city of Haifa lies 35 kilometers [sic] from the Lebanese border, and the distance [from the Lebanese border] to Nazareth is about 50 kilometers. Tomorrow will come the turn of Herzliya, Natanya, and Tel Aviv... The Muslim peoples must not allow this conflict to remain within the boundaries of the region. The Zionists are dispersed in many places around the world, and it is not so difficult to locate and get [our] hands on them. The entire world can and must be made unsafe for the Zionists, [including] their political and commercial centers. This does not require the governments' approval... The fateful day may have begun, and fierce revenge on the barbaric Zionists is underway, Allah willing." [3]

Jomhouri-e Eslami: The Islamic Republic of Iran is the Center of the Muslim World; The Leadership of the Islamic Revolution has a Key Role in Leading the Islamic Nation

The conservative daily Jomhour-e Eslami, affiliated with the Islamic seminaries of Qom, reiterated in a July 17 editorial that "the conspiracy of bringing down the Twin Towers in New York with one plane, which was totally dubious, was a pretext for occupying Afghanistan and Iraq, and for [providing] unqualified support to the Zionist regime in its crimes against Palestine.

"Since then, the American government has worked to place many restrictions on the Muslims in America and Europe, to place even tighter constraints on the Muslim countries which depend upon it, to change each and every one of them... to impose on the Muslims the political, ideological, and social order that is convenient [for America], and to exert pressure on the independent Muslim states - so that no obstacle will stand in its way, and it will be able to grasp the entire Islamic world in its claws...

"America's collaboration with the Zionists in murdering the Palestinian people, destroying Lebanon, and [hurling] baseless accusations against Iran [regarding] nuclear activity - which is now coming to a head - is a new phase in America's crusade against the Muslims. This is exactly the point at which the leadership of the Islamic nation must play a role.

"The Islamic Republic of Iran is now the central [pillar] of the Islamic world, and the leadership of the Islamic Revolution has a key role in leading the Islamic nation. This unity with the leadership of the Islamic Revolution is now the national duty of Iran and of all the Muslim peoples. Only mutual ties of this sort can guide the Islamic nation, [enabling it to] pass this difficult [phase] and to defeat the Crusader and Zionist enemies, which together have declared war on Islam and on the Muslims." [4]

Iranian Foreign Ministry Spokesman Reza Asefi: "Iran Expects Russia and China to Defend Iran's Inalienable Nuclear Rights"

In response to the claim that Iran has ordered the Hizbullah attack on Israel in order to draw attention away from the G8 talks on its nuclear issue, Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Reza Asefi said: "This is obviously a baseless accusation intended to rescue the Zionist regime from the quagmire [in which it has sunk]." He denied that Iran supplied arms to Hizbullah, saying: "Hizbullah has these capabilities on its own..." [5]

In his weekly press conference Asefi declared: "Iran expects Russia and China to defend Iran's inalienable nuclear rights... To support Iran's rights is to support the international organizations and treaties, [such as] the Non-Proliferation Treaty... [It is] not only support for Iran." [6]

LEBANESE REACTIONS

Hizbullah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah on Al-Manar TV, July 16

On July 16, 2006, Hizbullah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah gave a speech, aired on Al-Manar TV. The following are excerpts (translated by MEMRI TV, see memritv.org ):

"I want to say a few words to the good, steadfast, honorable, and pure people, whom we have heard in recent days on the media. We have heard their perseverance, their support, and their love.

"You are truly a great people. I am not just saying this out of pride, arrogance, or flattery. This is a people of historic [greatness], on whom hopes are pinned to save Lebanon and the nation - the entire nation - from its state of degradation and humiliation, and to instill new hope in the nation.

"I tell you again that with your support, your embrace, with your love, your perseverance, and your steadfastness, we will be victorious. The buildings and places that are being destroyed - we will cooperate with the Lebanese state...

"But in this matter, I say to you: Do not worry about what the Israeli war machine can destroy. All we wish is that the wounded be healed, and that the living have a long and healthy life. As for what is being destroyed - with the help of Allah, and by cooperation with the Lebanese state... We too, as an interested party, are determined to be serious in rebuilding what is being destroyed.

"I tell you, without going into details now, that we have friends who are also serious in this, and who have a very great ability to help us with pure, clean, and honorable money, and without any political conditions.

"There is nothing to worry about regarding the rebuilding of our country. What is important is that we persevere now and emerge victorious from this battle...

"The last point I want to make... I would like to turn to the peoples of the Arab and Islamic world. I turn to them only to make things clear to them, and to face them up to their responsibility. I have no intention to appeal to them, to call upon them, or to request anything from them. From the first moment of Operation True Promise and the ensuing confrontations, I and my brothers have taken upon ourselves and have agreed that in this confrontation we would not ask for anything from any human being.

"Many have called us to offer their services, but we have said that we ask for nothing. We will not initiate any request - not on the material level, the political level, not with regard to the media, not on the popular level, or the military level. We make appeals, requests, and supplications only to Allah, because we believe in Him, in His capabilities, in His greatness, and in His true promise that the believers will be victorious.

"We place our trust in Allah. When I am turning now to the Arab and Islamic peoples, I am not doing so to ask them to save us or give us aid. No. We, Allah be praised, are fine. We are in a very strong position, and we are at the beginning of a confrontation on which we pin great hopes.

"But I would like to face them up to their responsibility. Yesterday, you - and especially the Arab peoples - witnessed the outcome of the meeting of the Arab foreign ministers, and saw what can possibly come out of the Arab League. They themselves talk about the failure of the so-called peace process, and it has become clear that they are incapable - as governments, leaders, and regimes - of doing anything.

"In any case, we do not place our bets there. You, the Arab and Islamic peoples, have an interest in taking a stand for the sake of your place in the world to come, if you believe in it, and for the sake of your life in this world, your honor, your strength, your future, and the future or your children and grandchildren. In other words, the way things are now… If, in this conflict, God forbid, Israel succeeds in defeating the resistance in Palestine or in Lebanon, the Arab world - both governments and peoples - will drown in eternal humiliation. It will have no way out. This will only increase the condescension of the Zionists and of their American masters towards the Arab governments and peoples. The American and Israeli interference in the affairs of these governments and peoples will only increase, along with the plundering of our resources, the eradication of our culture and civilization, and the disintegration and division of this region, which will be drawn into internal strife, and so on.

"Today, the Arab and Islamic nation is facing a historic opportunity to unite, to release themselves from the plan of disintegration, sectarian and civil wars, to which America is pushing the peoples of the region.

"Today, the peoples of the Arab and Islamic nation are facing a historic opportunity to accomplish a great historic victory over the Zionist enemy.

"The question is not who imposes his conditions on whom. Today, we have a great opportunity of this kind. I am not exaggerating. In 2000, we in Lebanon, with modest capabilities and efforts, and with a small number of mujahideen, with few supplies and little equipment, presented a model of how resistance can overcome an occupation army.

"Today, we are presenting a model, along with the Lebanese people and Lebanon in its entirety - although we serve as the spearhead, and although villages, towns, and neighborhoods affiliated with us are subject to killing and destruction... This is true of all Lebanese, but they are concentrating on us... We are trying to present another model - a model of steadfastness, resistance, perseverance, courage, and of the ability to defeat the enemy. We do this in a battle that is unbalanced in material terms, but in spirit, morale, determination, wisdom, planning, and in placing our trust in Allah, this battle is unbalanced in our favor.

"Where are you, oh Arab and Islamic peoples? What are you doing? How will you act? That is up to you. As far as we are concerned, when we began the resistance in 1982, we did not look beyond our borders at all. We looked only to Allah. We relied only upon our people and our mujahideen. Today, we are the same. But what I wanted to tell you at this sensitive moment, and following many military successes in recent days, and following many surprises - and more surprises are yet to come, Allah willing - is that Hizbullah is not waging the battle of Hizbullah or of Lebanon. We are waging the battle of the nation, whether we like it or not, whether the Lebanese like it or not. Lebanon and the resistance of Lebanon are waging the battle of the nation. Where does the nation stand with regard to this battle? This question is directed at you, for the sake of your life in this world and in the world to come."

Sa'd Al-Hariri: There Should Be a Reckoning With the Adventurers who Embroiled Lebanon in the Crisis

In an interview with the Saudi government daily Okaz, Sa'd Al-Hariri, chairman of the Al-Mustaqbal party, said: "The recent position [taken by] the [Saudi] kingdom is rational and is characterized by political acumen... In its declaration [i.e. its criticism of Hizbullah and Iran], the [Saudi] kingdom said the whole truth. These adventurers [i.e. Hizbullah] have placed us in a difficult situation because of their irresponsibility, and in fact, the Saudi position [presented] the present situation as it really is... We support this stance because we are fed up with the exaggerations and the slogans... which ultimately brought about the destruction of the Lebanese infrastructure and the murder of innocent Lebanese. We demand a reckoning with these adventurers who embroiled Lebanon in a crisis it does not need. The truth must be stated even if it is painful and difficult, as it was stated by [Foreign Minister] Saud Al-Faysal in his speech at the Cairo [Arab foreign ministers] meeting...

"...Lebanon has been embroiled in a war, and we do not know how it will end. [Those responsible] did not consult anybody, and did not coordinate [this] with the government... We do not want the continuation of this destruction..."

Regarding the Arab rift [that emerged] in the meeting, he said: "The position of the [Saudi] kingdom, Egypt, Jordan, and the Gulf states was positive, and those hypocrites [i.e. Syria and Iran] calling for battle, are in fact the people most distant from this struggle. They want to bring the region into an all-out war..." [7]

Lebanese Daily: There is No Alternative but to ExtendLebaneseSovereigntyOverAllLebaneseTerritories

An editorial in the Lebanese daily Al-Mustaqbal called for extending Lebanese sovereignty over all Lebanese territories: "A declaration saying that Lebanon has a sovereign government is the only way out [of the crisis]... The primary goal must be to stop the [Israeli] aggression, and in order for the aggression to end, there is no alternative but for the state to extend its sovereignty over its territories and to be the only one to speak in the name of the country...

"If the price that must be paid for stopping the aggression is the extension of the state's sovereignty over all Lebanese territories, then that is the cheapest price, and it cannot be compared with the prices that have been paid up until now or to the price [that it is liable to pay] if the aggression continues..." [8]

SYRIAN REACTIONS

Syrian Daily Criticizes Arab States for Calling Hizbullah Operation an "Adventure"

An editorial in the Syrian government daily Al-Ba'th harshly condemned the Arab states for criticizing the Hizbullah operation and calling it an "adventure": "Isn't it a disgrace that some [of the Arabs] speak as though they are on the side hostile to the Lebanese people, to its resistance, and to its national symbols?...

"The Lebanese and Palestinian national and Islamic resistance [forces] are not being 'adventurous.' They are defending the land, people, and honor of Lebanon and Palestine.... The 'adventurous' ones are those for whom honor and homeland have become contemptible [matters]..." [9]

Syrian Information Minister Muhsin Bilal: "Syria Supports the Struggle of the Lebanese National Resistance Against the Israeli Aggression"

Syrian Information Minister Muhsin Bilal said: "In any case of attack, we will respond with the strength and in the manner appropriate to the [nature of the] enemy... Syria supports the struggle of the Lebanese national resistance against the Israeli aggression... The Israeli aggression is losing and the resistance will triumph..."

Bilal added: "Victory will be on the side of the truth, and the victors will be those fighting for truth, justice, liberty, and the holy [places]. We seek truth and justice, and believe in our right and in our land..." [10]




To: Brumar89 who wrote (296642)7/24/2006 10:00:19 PM
From: Proud Deplorable  Respond to of 1572571
 
Special Dispatch Series - No. 1200
July 7, 2006 No.1200

Columnist & Former Editor of London Daily Al-Hayat: Israeli Leaders' Crimes are Like Nazis'

In a July 6, 2006 article titled "From One Intifada to Another" in both the Arabic and English editions of the London Arabic-language daily Al-Hayat, columnist and former Al-Hayat editor Jihad Al-Khazen compares Israel to Nazi Germany and draws an analogy between the Palestinian terrorist attack on the Kerem Shalom crossing, in which IDF soldier Cpl. Gilad Shalit was taken hostage, and the 1943 Warsaw Ghetto uprising.

The following are excerpts from the article, which appears in the original English: [1]

"The Latest Israeli Offensive Reminds Me of What I Read About the Warsaw Ghetto"

"About six million Jews lost their lives in the Nazi Holocaust. [But while] the [number of] victims of the tit-for-tat killings between Israelis and Palestinians during the past decades may not reach the number of the victims of Auschwitz and Treblinka in a day, there are obvious similarities between what the Jews suffered under Nazism and what the descendants of the Holocaust victims are afflicting to the Palestinians.

"The latest Israeli offensive reminds me of what I read about the Warsaw Ghetto. This was a poor Jewish neighborhood in the Polish capital, which was targeted by the racist Nazis. After the German occupation of Poland in 1939, the Jews in the Ghetto suffered all forms of starvation, deportation and genocide. Some Jewish partisans revolted on April 19, 1943. They shot and threw grenades at German patrols. The Nazis responded by shelling houses block by block and rounding up or killing any Jew they could capture. Significant resistance ended on April 23, and the uprising ended on May 16.

"During the fighting, approximately 7000 Jewish partisans were killed, apart from 6000 others who were burned alive or gassed. Before these confrontations, the population of the Ghetto was estimated at about 380,000. By the end of the uprising, only 50,000 remained. They were sent to German death camps. Most of them went to Treblinka."

"The Whole Gaza Strip is a Nazi-Like Concentration Camp"

"This Jewish uprising was not much different than the Palestinian one. The Palestinian Resistance carried out a military operation against Israeli soldiers. A soldier is supposed to kill and be killed. The Israeli response was almost the same as the Nazis'. They attacked the whole Gaza Strip, striking bridges and a power plant. They destroyed the water supply as a means of collective punishment in the Nazi way. The whole Gaza Strip is a Nazi-like concentration camp, just as the Warsaw Ghetto was after the German occupation of Poland."

"The Government of Fuhrer Olmert Will Not Send the People of Gaza to Gas Camps Because Oil is Expensive"

"The numbers are different, but all the other details are similar. I think that the government of 'Führer' (leader) Olmert will not send the people of Gaza to gas camps because oil is expensive. Hitler was not worried about television, which now exposes the murders of Muhammad Al-Dura, Huda Ghalia, and the children and women of Gaza.

"I do not believe that the Israeli government will force the Palestinians to wear a badge to distinguish the Arabs or Muslims from the superior Jewish race. However, Olmert's government might decide to force the Palestinians to wear something like a yellow Star of David, with the word 'Jew' written in the middle. Hence, I suggest a crescent with a green background, and the word 'Arab' or 'Muslim' written in the middle. The Jews in Europe had to wear badges that distinguished them. Olmert's government might force the Palestinians to make their own badges. If so, Israel will hit two birds with one stone: achieve ethnic discrimination and find a solution for unemployment, the worst problem facing the Palestinians in the Strip.

"I know that the Jews reject any comparison between the Nazi Holocaust and any massacre or racial genocide, whether in Pol Pot's Cambodia, in Rwanda or any where else. I know that most of the Jews around the world have nothing to do with the practices of the Israeli army and settlers. Most of them are moderate liberals, but the similarities are undeniable."

"Are We Going to See the Day When Israeli War Criminals Stand in the Dock Like the Nazi Leaders at the Nurembeg Trials?"

"Are we going to see the day when Israeli war criminals stand in the dock, like the Nazi leaders at the Nuremberg trials? Before I answer the question, I would like to make a small digression into history.

"The U.S. Treasury Secretary at that time, Henry Morgenthau, proposed a plan to rid Germany of any Nazi-like manifestations (this is similar to what is happening in Iraq). The plan was named after Morgenthau, and it included deportation, forced labor, and economic sanctions. Both Churchill and Roosevelt approved the plan. They tried to put it into effect at the Second Quebec Conference in September 1944. But Stalin and U.S. public opinion opposed the plan. Eventually, President Truman, who succeeded Roosevelt in 1945, approved the plan of U.S. Secretary of War Henry Stimson. The Stimson plan became the basis for the trial of European war criminals.

"In Israel, the Minister of Finance, Abraham Hirchson, or the Minister of Interior, Roni Bar-On, or the Minister of Internal Security, Avi Dichter, may also come up with a plan similar to Morgenthau's. It would include deportation, forced labor and economic sanctions, especially since deportation and sanctions have already begun. What prevents the use of forced labor is the fear of the rise of terrorism.

"I do not believe that I will see a trial of Israeli war criminals like the Nuremberg trials. The victorious party is the one that decides who is a terrorist. Had Hitler won the war, all the leaders of the US, Britain, France and the USSR would have been prosecuted instead of the Germans, among whom were Martin Bormann, Hermann Göring, Alfred Jodl, Ernst Kaltenbrunner, and Joachim von Ribbentrop."

The Israelis' Crimes are Similar to the Nazis', No Matter How the Numbers May Differ

"As long as Israel has the final say and is backed by the U.S., the tail will continue to wag the dog. Ehud Olmert, Shaul Mofaz, and Dan Halutz will not be punished, as they deserve. Their crimes are similar to the Nazis', no matter how the numbers may differ.

"Is it reasonable that the descendents of the Holocaust victims, or its survivors, practice what their ancestors had suffered? There are psychological explanations for this that I do not claim to understand. So, I will not try to philosophize.

"I understand that my analogy will annoy many Jews. I will not deny that it is fully intended. Perhaps the criminals will regain their reason and realize what they are doing. What I have to say to the moderate Jewish majority that seeks peace, is that they need to impose their will in order not to be stained with the crimes of an extremist minority."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[1] Dar Al-Hayat, July 6, 2006.




To: Brumar89 who wrote (296642)7/24/2006 10:06:08 PM
From: Proud Deplorable  Respond to of 1572571
 
Special Dispatch Series - No. 1169
May 23, 2006 No.1169

Abu Mazen Calls to Stop the Firing of Missiles Into Israel

In his speech on "Nakba Day" on May 15, 2006, PA Chairman Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen) called to stop the firing of missiles into Israel. Other senior Palestinian officials made similar statements, and condemned suicide attacks because they harm the Palestinian cause.

The following are excerpts:

Abu Mazen: The Tel Aviv Bus Station Attack was "One of the Base Attacks That Harm the Palestinian People"

In his May 15, 2006 speech commemorating the nakba, Abu Mazen said: "The futile firing of missiles needs to be stopped, [as they] mostly just give Israel a pretext to escalate its aggression against our citizens in the Gaza Strip." [1]

The bombing of the old central bus station in Tel Aviv evoked a particularly harsh condemnation on the part of Abu Mazen: "We released an official PA announcement in which we condemned [the attack] in the strongest possible terms, and we considered it to be one of the base attacks that harms the Palestinian people… The PA, the government, and the security services need to prevent such attacks." [2]

"Traditional Warfare Against Israel is a Severe Policy Error, If Not Total Political Folly"

Hani Al-Masri, director of the Palestinian Information Ministry and a columnist for the PA daily Al-Ayyam, wrote: "Stop launching missiles on Israel from Gaza. I say this even though such a statement might expose me to accusations that I am calling on the Palestinians to surrender - which is not the case. On the contrary, this call to stop the firing of missiles and mortars is likely to strengthen the Palestinians' capacity to show that they stand firm on their homeland. It will bolster their ability to conduct resistance capable of putting an end to the occupation, and not [merely] resistance for the sake of resistance or for the sake of settling internal scores.

"In the past, I and a few others like me called to stop [the firing of] the missiles, when Hamas was not in power but was the one who fired the missiles. I [still] demand this today, when Hamas is in power and is leading the government. I am demanding this not in order to harass [anyone], but for the sake of the supreme national interest.

"...Stopping the missile fire will deprive Israel of its ability to use pretexts, and will reveal its [real] intentions and goals... It is true that there is a certain value to firing missiles at Israel, as this harms the Israeli deterrence theory and undermines security in Israel. However, conducting an arms race and traditional warfare against Israel is a severe policy error, if not total political folly.

"The outcome of the war of mortars and missiles was bitter, contrary to all the counter-arguments. It is impossible to sum up the 'liberation' of Gaza as [a case of] the occupation fleeing from mortars and missiles...

"Taking into account the current balance of power, it would be a grave error to conduct a military conflict, because Israel has overwhelming military superiority - it benefits from American backing, and the international community is more apathetic than ever. The military resistance should be secondary and of limited scope - for the [sole] purpose of self-defense. "

The Resistance Does Not Take Into Account the Disastrous Consequences of the Attacks

"Resistance is a natural right and a national necessity for defeating the occupation, but the military resistance in general, and the missile fire and martyrdom-seeking operations inside Israel in particular, exceed the possibilities [allowed by] the circumstances and by the options available to the Palestinian people, [since the Palestinians] cannot compete with Israel in military warfare.

"[The resistance] does not take into account the disastrous consequences, past and present, [of the missile fire and martyrdom-seeking operations]. The Israeli casualties from mortar and missile fire were minor, and today they are miniscule, apart from harm to morale. The Palestinians, on the other hand, suffer losses and injuries every day.

"World opinion has gained the impression that this is a conflict between two armies - not between the occupation, which has all the capabilities necessary for military warfare, and an unarmed people, that has no means of resistance except its strong will and determination.

"The Palestinian government must support the right of resistance...; must oppose the [international] blackmailing, which aims to force the Palestinians to make political compromises; and must criticize the silence of the international community. It has an obligation to define its position on the subject of the futile bombardments...

"Hamas stopped the martyrdom-seeking operations following the comprehensive Palestinian agreement on the tahdiah [state of calm], and it still honors [the agreement]... It stopped [these operations] more than a year ago, and stopped firing missiles and mortars several months ago, on the eve of the Palestinian parliamentary elections.

"If resistance [conducted] by firing mortars and missiles and [carrying out] martyrdom-seeking operations were effective at this point, and could achieve its goals, there would be no need to refrain from using it. The government must supply all means that are crucially needed in order to stand firm, so as to allow the resistance to get underway without restrictions. "

The Resistance Needs a Common Strategy Regarding Forms of Struggle and Negotiation

"The resistance must formulate a common strategy that will clarify what forms of struggle and what forms of political activity and negotiation are appropriate, effective, and able to achieve the national goals. Therefore, we need to stop treating negotiations and resistance as though they were a private affair about which each faction, group, or person [may] decide as he wishes... Hamas is now being burnt by the fire that it ignited... We need to initiate a serious national dialogue in order to come up with a unified plan of action that will yield a common national program defining the aims and nature of the struggle..." [3]

Former PLO Ambassador Yahya Rabah: The Continuation of the Current Situation May Lead to the Reoccupation of Gaza

Former PLO ambassador in Yemen and current columnist for the PA daily Al-Hayat Al-Jadida Yahya Rabah wrote: "We held elections, and Hamas won. Instead of reaching national consensus and convincing the world of the advantages of our democracy and its ability to [bring about] dialogue with the other, we turned our backs on ourselves, and once again made futile noises about how the world must accept the results of democracy in Palestine...

"[But] every time one of the [factions] carries out a bombing operation or fires a missile, without any coordination whatsoever with other [factions] and without reading the map [i.e. evaluating the situation], we continue to ]blame Israel]...

"Today this situation is deteriorating, and we are isolated. One day we will wake up to find that Israeli Army forces have returned to the Gaza Strip..." [4]




To: Brumar89 who wrote (296642)7/24/2006 10:11:10 PM
From: Proud Deplorable  Respond to of 1572571
 
Special Dispatch Series - No. 1205
July 14, 2006 No.1205

Iran and the Recent Escalation on Israel's Borders (2): Reaction in Iran, Lebanon, and Syria

On July 13, 2006, the Iranian, Syrian, and Lebanese media published articles and statements on the emerging conflict between Israel and Hizbullah.

It is noteworthy that on May 4, 2006, Hizbullah founder and former secretary-general Sheikh Subhi Al-Tufeili told Al-Arabiya TV: "They [Hizbullah] are committed to the Iranian policy... I have said before that the Shi'ites in Lebanon serve as Iran's 'playing ground'... Hizbullah definitely fosters its relations with the Syrians, but its real leadership is 'the rule of the jurisprudent' - in other words, [Iranian Supreme Leader Ali] Khamenei." (See MEMRI TV Clip No. 1132, May 4, 2006, memritv.org ).

The following are excerpts from the articles and statements in the Iranian, Syrian, and Lebanese media. [1]

Iranian President Ahmadinejad Threatens Europe

Following the July 12, 2006 decision by the 5+1 (the five permanent U.N. Security Council members plus Germany) to return Iran's nuclear dossier to the Security Council, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad threatened Europe, saying:

"If the Iranian nation and its government conclude that the Western countries do not have good will [in resolving Iran's nuclear issue], they will change their policy vis-à-vis the package of incentives [offered to Iran by the West in exchange for halting uranium enrichment]... No one can expect tense relations that have existed for a number of years to be resolved in a very short period of time... The exacerbation of the tensions in the [Middle East] region will be to the detriment of the Europeans. The Iranian nation and government are sufficiently strong and safe from any harm that [any] tensions can cause."

Ahmadinejad also warned Israel's supporters that "any help to the [Israeli] regime will make them partners in the crime of genocide and other illegal acts in the occupied territories, and to their Muslim citizens... The Zionist regime was created by repression and terror, and the continuation of its crimes will only hasten its downfall." [2]

Conservative Iranian Daily Kayhan: Nuclear Iran has Eradicated Israel's Nuclear Prestige

In a July 13, 2006 editorial, the conservative Iranian daily Kayhan, which is close to Iranian Leader Ali Khamenei, praised the Hizbullah operation and stated: [3] "[Prior to the Hizbullah operation,] the oppressing Israeli regime would appear with three cards in the Palestinian game: the card of America, the card of the [Arab] regimes in the region that are sympathetic to it, and the card of [its] nuclear superiority. With these three cards, [Israel] would come out the winner in every game, and vanquish its opponents [in the region].

"With today's perspective, [these three cards] have collapsed completely, because America's ability to impose Israel's will on the Palestinian, Lebanese, and Syrian side has come to naught. At this time, the Hamas government, the Lebanese government, and the Syrian government cannot permit America to enter into the Palestinian-Israeli equation. That is, the factors within the countries in the region that used to turn America's involvement into something influential have collapsed.

"On the other hand, Israel's military advantage in the region has eroded, and nuclear Iran is eradicating the nuclear prestige of Israel... Today's Iran has - by virtue of its impenetrable leadership and with top officials who are unanimous in their support of [Iran's Supreme] Leader [Ali Khamenei], and who are well-liked in the Middle East - have struck, time and again, at... Israel's force, and have brought it to the verge of collapse."

Syrian Government Daily Al-Thawra Calls to Continue in the Path of the Resistance That has Proven its Effectiveness

In a July 13, 2006 editorial, the Syrian government daily Al-Thawra called for the continuation of the path of the resistance, which, it said, is the only one that has been effective with the Israelis: "The language of intimidation and threat is nothing but the language of those who have not experienced the pride of the resistance. Likewise, it is language that will lead to nothing but submission, and thus we must persist in not listening to those who speak it. This is because no one can deny the right of the resistance to bring back the resistance fighters from the Israeli prisons...

"The [only] language that is effective with the Israelis is [the language] of the resistance!! No other path has been effective - on the contrary, [every other path] has only increased the Israeli arrogance, to the level that Israel has acted as if it lives alone in the world!!...

"The congratulations that the Arab citizens exchanged with each other [following the Hizbullah operation] are a kind of request [to implement] the program of the resistance, which began to develop more and more amongst the Arabs after they sensed the height of the power of the positive results of the resistance...

"Thus, the culture of the resistance is expected to spread further - because it has proven its effectiveness and its usefulness, and it is now the culture of the Arab street, which is always willing to pay the price of the resistance, however [high] it may be. Pay attention to what [Hizbullah Secretary-General] Hassan Nasrallah has said: [We are] ready and willing [to fight]." [4]

Two Lebanese Dailies: Was Hizbullah Operation in Service of Iran and Syria?

*Was Yesterday's Operation Aimed at Taking the International Pressure Regarding Nuclear Dossier Off Iran?

Also on July 13, Sarkis Na'um, columnist for the Christian Lebanese daily Al-Nahar, wrote: "The successful military operation carried out yesterday morning by the Islamic Resistance [i.e. Hizbullah]... raises many questions among the Lebanese: [For example,] was yesterday's operation aimed at liberating the Lebanese prisoners in Israeli jails... [when] there are alternative ways to achieve this goal - [alternatives] which would spare Lebanon [all] the destruction, damage, invasions and fatalities?...

"Was yesterday's operation aimed at easing the considerable pressure being brought to bear by the international community, headed by the U.S., on the Islamic Republic of Iran regarding its nuclear dossier? [Was the operation meant to ease this pressure] by shifting the [world's] attention towards Lebanon and the region - which will enable Iran to get what it wants before giving the international community its response to the [West's] 'incentives package' - and will free it from the [threat that its nuclear dossier] will be referred to the Security Council?"

*Iran Can Use This Operation to Imply That it "Holds the Region by its Veins"

In a July 13, 2006 editorial, the Lebanese daily Al-Mustaqbal criticized the Hizbullah attack on Israel: "Despite the universal joy felt by the Lebanese and Arabs over the success of the Hizbullah operation... the timing [of this operation] has distressed and is [still] distressing large sectors in Lebanon... What distresses them most is that the prerogative of taking a decision [in matters] of war and peace, which [belongs to] the State of Lebanon, has been usurped by the resistance [i.e. by Hizbullah]. Whatever circumstances and reasons [behind] the secrecy of Operation True Promise [Hizbullah's name for the attack; it promised to liberate all prisoners in Israeli jails], they do not change the fact that the State of Lebanon, and all the Lebanese [people], have been presented with a fait accompli for which they did not prepare, [and now] they must bear its consequences, which may be dire, when they never [even] had a part in shaping their own fate.

"Moreover, the great promise [made to] the Lebanese [by their government] - a quiet summer full of tourists that will give them the economic boost that they so desperately need and that is urgently [needed] by the [Lebanese] economy, which is on the verge of collapse - has given way to another, more important, promise, [namely, that of liberating the prisoners]. It is natural that now, when there is no chance of fulfilling [the promise of a peaceful summer], the Lebanese will return to their despair. The greatest danger is that helplessness and extremism will increase among them, and they will sink into frustration [that may] undermine the unity of Lebanese society...

"As legitimate as this operation may be, some Lebanese are entitled to question whether its timing was free [of external considerations], and to what extent it serves the overall Syrian-Iranian strategy.

"Iran, which is [currently] engaged in difficult negotiations with the West, and especially with Washington, regarding its nuclear dossier, can use this operation as one of the 'messages' that it aims daily at the West, and especially at Washington - thus implying that it holds the region by its veins and controls it by force. Syria... can [also] use this operation... to pressure Washington into concessions regarding the Lebanese [issue], and especially regarding the investigation into the murder of former [Lebanese] prime minister Rafiq Al-Hariri..." [5]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



To: Brumar89 who wrote (296642)7/25/2006 8:08:44 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572571
 
I do think Israel should crush Hezbollah, though

Well in the process of crushing Hezbollah, they are killing innocent people and children, destroying block after block of apts., firing on ambulances, at hospitals and now they just took out some UN observers. In the meantime, one has to wonder if they are crushing Hezbollah at all.

What I do know.......is that its very likely that they have benefited Hezbollah's recruitment efforts. All of that should give you pause but I suspect it won't.