Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (296735)	7/25/2006 10:30:32 AM
From: 10K a day	Respond to of 1572963

I've been trying for 5 years to understand neo harris. the guy dances to the beat of a different F16.

To: Road Walker who wrote (296735)	7/25/2006 10:50:42 AM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572963

chronwatch.com Illegal Aliens Winning, Americans Losing Written by Jim Kouri Tuesday, July 25, 2006 It's widely been reported that illegal aliens comprise upwards of 27 percent of the U.S. prison and jail population. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Customs and Border Protection--two agencies within the Department of Homeland Security--claim in several reports that they've apprehended over 100,000 criminal aliens whose offenses go far beyond violation of immigration laws and regulations. That figure doesn't include llegal aliens arrested and incarcerated in state and local penal institutions. Sadly, only about 25 percent of expenses for imprisoning criminal aliens is reimbursed by the federal government to state and local governments. This creates a hardship for taxpayers in states with high incarceration rates for criminal aliens. The proponents of open borders or lax immigration enforcement always point to the benefits derived from illegal immigration such as the amount of taxes they pay into the government system. Evidence, however, exists that refutes those claims. For instance, there is an abundance of anecdotal evidence that suggests a large number of illegal aliens are paid "off-the-books." Therefore, those wages are not taxed. The National Research Council has estimated that the net fiscal cost of immigration ranges from $11 billion to $22 billion per year, with most government expenditures on immigrants coming from state and local coffers, while most taxes paid by immigrants who actually do pay taxes go to the federal treasury. The net deficit is caused by a low level of tax payments by immigrants, because they are disproportionately low-skilled and thus earn low wages, and a higher rate of consumption of government services, both because of their relative poverty and their higher fertility. This is especially true of illegal immigration. Even though illegal aliens make little use of welfare, from which they are generally barred, the costs of illegal immigration in terms of government expenditures for education, criminal justice, and emergency medical care are significant. Californian officials have estimated that the net cost to taxpayers in order to provide government services to illegal immigrants approached $3 billion during a single fiscal year. The fact that states must bear the cost of federal failure turns illegal immigration, in effect, into one of the largest unfunded federal mandates existing today. In addition, according to the Center for Immigration Studies, even with free trade, the United States continues to enjoy a higher real wage than other nations, due to the superiority of U.S. technology. If taken to an extreme and the United States removed all barriers to migration, most foreign workers would move to the United States, lured by the higher wages available here; foreign labor would essentially cease to exist. However, with all labor now in the United States, the prices of goods would return to their level of self-sufficiency, prior to the opening of trade. That is, perfectly free migration entirely eliminates the gains from trade that U.S. natives had enjoyed. World income rose with the migration, but the natives of foreign countries in this case received nearly all of this rise, since the income of U.S. natives declined. With the world's majority of low-wage workers in the United Stateas, there would be tremendous damage to free trade and its benefits, with U.S. middle and upper-middle class workers suffering the brunt of declining wages. The urge for a utopian state of existence and a desire to make all things equal by the American left has given way to a desire simply to make all things equal sans utopia. In their passion for a neo-Marxist level for the masses, they've decided, consciously or not, that if they could not bring the world's population up to the American level of prosperity and wealth, then they will bring U.S. citizens down to the world's level of poverty and misery. For this is a result of seeing free trade as a zero-sum entity, as well as the self-alienation of the American leftists from their own country, the USA. In addition, this Marxist equity is a major step towards the underlying vision of a New World Order, consisting of an elite omnipotent class of rulers and a closely managed population of commoners. Sources: National Criminal Justice Research Service, Department of Justice, The Center for Immigration Studies, National Institute of Justice. About the Writer: Jim is currently fifth vice-president of the National Association of Chiefs of Police. He's former chief at a New York City housing project in Washington Heights nicknamed "Crack City" by reporters covering the drug war in the 1980s. In addition, he has served as director of security for several major organizations. He's also served on the National Drug Task Force. ADV: "I HAVEN'T HAD A GLASS OF WATER IN 20 YEARS." Drinking tons of water is great...if you want to raise your stroke risk, bring on kidney failure, and encourage early Alzheimer's. This is just one example of how MASS MEDIA MEDICINE is ruining our health. YOU CAN LIVE LONG and LOVE every minute of IT! isecureonline.com