Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: peanut_butter who wrote (22537)	7/25/2006 8:48:58 PM
From: Honey_Bee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

Oh my, peanut butter, I sure have no desire to get into an "alias dispute" with you. I am willing to accept that you are the same person who posts at UTEK. I'd just like to know how you managed to get so many different aliases over here. I haven't figured out how to get two yet. ROFLOL! I see that you say you lost a "little" on the QQQQs. Sorry about that. You are to be credited for making better decisions than Bob Brinker. Did you know that he rode those pesky Qs all the way down from about $83 to about $20?? OUCH! Month after month he kept encouraging his subscribers to "hold" because another spectacular "counter trend rally" was coming in the Nasdaq. So if as a subscriber, you went against Bob Brinker, whom you seem to idealize, that is really remarkable. Now as you said, it's been six years and the trade was never closed and no guidance has been forthcoming since March 2003. Don't you feel sorry for those people who have been "long-time listeners and Marketimer subscribers" who are still following his last "guidance" which was to "hold" those QQQQs. Yep, Brinker sez, hold 'em while I start all over by adding RYOCX to my "model portfolios." You can't make this stuff up. ROFLOL! . .

To: peanut_butter who wrote (22537)	5/25/2007 6:01:42 PM
From: stockalot	Respond to of 42834

Queen, do you notice a tell in this post that you used to claim you did not make? Still want to claim that or not? To: honeytres who wrote (22508) 7/25/2006 3:34:43 PM From: peanut_butter 2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) of 31346 Honey, to respond to your message 22508: It's too dull and trivial to spend much time on but since I have 5 posts I'll use one. You tell me that you have "said many times that it was a sorry mistake on Brinker's part." Where exactly did you say this "many times." I certainly don't remember you saying it even one time since you started posting here as peanut butter--perhaps I missed these "many times" and you can point me to just one time. I posted on Yahoo as peanut_butter_luvr until the faint-hearted hide-behind-others-IDs copycat imp added an "e" as a final letter to my ID and used it for himself. After that I didn't post much. And I'm not going to get into an extended "alias" dispute with you or cheat/stockalot, rail as you will. I thought this board wasn't supposed to be about personal attacks on other posters. Of course it's my opinion that you didn't ruin your retirement when Bob Brinker made his biggest blunders by calling for several "counter-trend rallies" in the Nasdaq 100 Index. I notice that you didn't say my opinion was wrong. I didn't say you were right or wrong, what difference does it make? But no, I didn't ruin my retirement either financially or psychologically. First, I'm not retired, and second, I lost a little money because I was cautious and made my own decisions, but I'm not going to spend even one year agonizing and blaming, let alone six. And finally, about retirees' using their heads when following Bob Brinker, I agree. And the best way to do that is keep their $185+ in their own pockets and out of Brinker's. That's your opinion honey and it's little other than personal bias, but why don't we just leave that up to them? " Do you deny posting this as PEANUT BUTTER?