Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (25160)	7/31/2006 3:57:17 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541556

Mankiw's at Harvard not Mason. blogger.com Mason connected blogs gmu.edu I don't know if you reguarly follow this one but I think you've posted links from it, and I've posted links to you. marginalrevolution.com I've also sometimes posted links from here cafehayek.com On that blog I found a link to more economics blogs (no connection to Mason for at least most of them) neweconomist.blogs.com

To: Lane3 who wrote (25160)	7/31/2006 4:04:16 PM
From: TimF	Respond to of 541556

From Makiw's blog Ray Fair on Policy Stimulus A friend calls to my attention a paper by Yale economist Ray Fair, a well-known builder and user of large-scale macroeconometric models. Fair assesses the impact of monetary and fiscal policy during the recovery from the recent recession. An excerpt: Had there been no tax cuts, employment would have been 2.2 percent lower by 2004:3 than it actually was; had there been no large increases in federal purchases of goods, employment would have been 1.2 percent lower; and had there been no fall in short-term interest rates, employment would have been 2.5 percent lower. These effects are roughly additive in the model (fourth experiment), and the combined estimate is that employment would have been 5.6 percent lower in 2004:3 than it actually was. According to Fair, monetary and fiscal policy played roughly equal roles in the stimulating aggregate demand during the recovery. Fair's conclusions seem broadly consistent with the recent Treasury report: Treasury found that, without enactment of the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001, the Job Creation and Worker Assistance Act of 2002, and the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003: (1) by the second quarter of 2003, the economy would have created as many as 1.5 million fewer jobs and GDP would have been as much as 2 percent lower, and (2) by the end of 2004, the economy would have created as many as 3 million fewer jobs and real GDP would be as much as 3.5 to 4.0 percent lower. gregmankiw.blogspot.com -- I think the tax cuts have positive short run and long run effects, however I don't think they can be estimated with anywhere near that level of precision. Also while the spending increases may have had short term positive effects I think its fairly clear that the long term or even middle term effect of the spending increase is negative.