Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : FREE AMERICA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (9593)	7/25/2006 6:41:43 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14758

The question is not meaningless to me. I'm for America's interests first, and America has an interest in stability in the ME. A civil war in Iraq could be a real problem for us, since it could draw in other countries. I'm not even sure a civil war will be better for the Iraqis than Saddam, but that's a secondary consideration for me- America's interests are my primary consideration when we are spending American lives and money to accomplish something. Stability may not be your goal, but instability is highly over rated (often by people who have not had the pleasure of experiencing it.) IMO of course. Time will tell how good an idea the whole adventure was. History will be the judge, as it always is.