Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Moomin Valley (formerly Troll-free Zone) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Moominoid who wrote (1373)	7/25/2006 11:45:59 PM
From: RealMuLan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2852

I wonder whether Quantum was in HK to bid on HK$ devaluation and then only got hit due to the involvement of the HK gov., with the strong support of the Mainland China. Whoever bet in that one would lost money >>Compared to 2000, 2001, 2002 the volatility in the markets is very little now.<< That is true, BUT, I bet we will never ever see that kind of bubble and the resulted extremely high volatility again. It is the history and over. I think statistically, that period of time should be considered as outlier, should be excluded or at least should be normalized to certain degree. It will be misleading if any model use that as a normal/can happen again event.