SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: twmoore who wrote (13017)7/26/2006 5:32:54 AM
From: twmoore  Respond to of 20039
 
INVITATION RELATIVE TO FILM "LOOSE CHANGE"

For passing on to those who need to know and have not seen our films

As sure as we're becoming more fully aware of the impact of Global Warming,
we've got to come to grips with the truth of 9/11
Finding Proof Of The 9/11 Conspiracy:
World Trade Center building #7 suddenly collapsed in a 6 second
free fall pancaking on its own site and caught on film before
numerous witnesses. a huge 47 story building turned to rubble
(destruction appearing to be the entire intact structure settling
to the ground, crushing bottom floors up as it fell) all of which
confirmed that demolition was used and how the plot went far deeper
than mere airline hits on the towers. One would expect authorities
to jump on this, but they reacted by disputing or blackballing the
facts, not even mentioning building # 7 in the official reports.
We eventually learned it was also a station for the CIA,
Department Of Defense and IRS, thus its destruction obviously not
part of any foreign terrorist plot.

Unless being informed, what's presented here is almost too much
to grasp. Many Americans have only heard indirectly or seen limited
film footage. Main stream media has been no help, thus many kept
ignorant of what has surfaced. It's too ugly, too
preposterous...to accept that ones own government turns against its
own, but the evidences are too obvious and massive to ignore. And
far more has been uncovered regarding pre 9/11 preparations and all
which immediately followed 9/11, including health data falsifications
by the EPA, assuring New Yorkers it was entirely safe to be out,
they having just faced an immense toxic catastrophe, some dying, more
sicknesses reported every day. That was the work of the central
government directing the EPA.

There's no better way to explain this than reviewing the past
and how it changed me. Kept spotting it on the periphery of my
mind, first in those footage's of the collapsing towers on 9/11
while thrown into personal dilemma in understanding the implications
of all this to the Islamic world facing American wars of retribution.
Only unconsciously accepted the truth of how impossible it was that
these buildings collapsed as they did. Knew nothing then of WTC
building #7, little of incredulous circumstances around Flight 93
and the Pentagon crash.

There was no particular sequence I can remember by how truth got
to me, changed me, but it included and went something like this:
1) Beginning to hear of 9/11 conspiracy charges,
2) Being told of the WTC Bldg. #7 collapsing that day in the same
manner as the towers, but no plane involved; Hearing official
reports of fires from the towers reaching Bldg. #7, a good football
field distance away and not even apparent when it collapsed.
3) Being a builder myself and beginning to see the immensity of
this whole happening, as obviously the work of demolition and
reviewing the technology to assure myself, as I also learned many
others across the country, engineers, builders, scientists had
earlier done and were doing now,
4) Stunned by the massive outside evidence from high profile
engineers and scientists coming forward to label official reports of
how it all happened as being ludicrous and impossible in terms of
physics itself, outright bogus,
5) Learning that Bldg. #7 had been full of records about
stockholders, numerous wall street investigations and further, how
pre 9/11 info warnings had been released and many insiders making
millions on stocks with such information, George Bush's brother
head of security for the entire complex; Multi millions of gold
bullion removed from the basement of the towers and placed under WTC
bldg. #5 shortly before 9/11.
6) According to witnesses, the towers had been shut down to
public access numerous times prior to 9/11 (not normal procedure) and
unidentified men in the buildings during those times,
7) Learning of exact procedures for demolition (ie) destroying
the center of the buildings immense steel structure, a tightly
meshed heavy metal core, with explosive devices set from top to the
bottom of the buildings, using thermate, which cuts through such
steel at melting temperatures (which fires could never have managed )
in an imploding manner, causing buildings to fold in and collapse
upon themselves in a pancake manner, not toppling , twisting or
turning as would buildings going down as result of fire only. All
three buildings collapsed at almost free fall speed, impossible by
any other procedure than demolition; Thousands of tons of cement
turned to dust; The jet fuel burned out quickly and could not have
caused heat required for melting that type steel, again physics
showing it impossible. No such steel reinforced buildings have ever
been lost to fires, before or after 9/11.
8) Testimony of many who were there, hearing explosions going
off from top floors down to far beneath the ground floor... filming
which caught many flashes of light from windows all the way down,
just as buildings were collapsing and also spotting tremors in the
buildings. The seismic reports verified how nothing of the reading
that day could have been recorded by merely collapse of buildings.
Reports of great heat in the steel long after 9/11, as crews dug to
the depths of the debris; Report of a fire chief high up in one of
the towers just before it collapsed, saying the fire there could be
brought under control within two hours,
9) All of the steel remains immediately cut up and shipped to
Europe for melt down, no investigation allowed, but small pieces of
steel retrieved, analyzed and found with residues of thermate. So
much more we could cover at that site!
10) Learning more in depth of the False Flag plots this
government has consistently planned over time, including destruction
of American facilities and cities, in order to bring public opinion
to favor anything from Cuban attack to the rationale for war with
Korea; Knowing of numerous times our armed service personnel
exposed to nuclear and chemical testings, without being told of the
dangers they faced.
11) Turning to Flight 93, known to have landed in Cleveland
that day to an airport already quickly evacuated before their
arrival, the plane taxiing to a remote hanger, there nearly two
hours; Worth noting, the proven impossibility of cell phone calls
from that particular plane in the air at heights it was flying, as
well as the hardly damaged so-called crash site of Flight 93 in a
Pennsylvania countryside, no evidences of engines fuselage and or
bodies found.
12) Then to Washington D.C. to find officials had planned and
built heavy duty construction for just such an incident as happened
at the Pentagon, at precisely that part of the building hit. The
controversy over what kind of plane or flying object hit the
Pentagon. Film footage showing the outside wall area damaged, taken
shortly after it occurred, as if by a missile (easily confirmed
visually) as to how impossible it was, as reported by the
government of an airliner having done such damage. The missing film
footage of the whole crash as taken from two vantage points,
instantly picked up by the FBI after the accident, but never
released. If a Boeing aircraft, as the government reported, there
were no 6 ton engines or large fuselage plane parts found in the
wreckage, us being told they melted in extreme heat, although
another engine of the missile or jet type, found intact along with
almost 200 bodies being removed and identified.
13) The information regarding something to happen soon,
bringing the FAA to call for all planes to be grounded on 9/11, most
all of our entire fleet of military reconnaissance planes purposely
directed to go elsewhere on training's shortly before 9/11, leaving
only a few available, but not in the skies until after all of these
9/11 hits; (other planes being spotted in the air over the
capitol)......all of this being only a few of a long list of
critical questions raised and never answered about expected attacks,
yet total lack of readiness. Why?

I'm saying I know it's true, what this government has done to
us...and joining so many others who feel the same. It's no longer
simply agreeing with people about how; "Yes, they're capable of such
things." I've seen the overwhelming evidences and feel it
viscerally, as if I had just witnessed people shot down before me,
almost too much to comprehend or bear! That this government could
plan and execute such a catastrophe and once done, attempting to hide
the millions of tons of a gigantic crime obviously impossible to
pull off....and as impossible to explain away!

Abusive, dominant power counts on our willingness to submit.
Essentially it's the most monumental hurdle we've ever faced, a
crossroads....emergence of a tough personal- political moment of
confirming these monstrous acts and more that will follow...us going
along ...... or knowing it will never do and seeking out others in
finding the best means to stop it!

In Mein Kampf, Hitler states; "The size of the lie is a
definite factor in causing it to be believed (the bigger the better)
because the vast masses of a nation are, in the depths of their
hearts, more easily deceived than they are consciously and
intentionally bad."

For numerous resources, scientif/profesional studies and reportings...

Go to: www.st911.org and see the film : "Loose Change"



To: twmoore who wrote (13017)7/26/2006 2:47:00 PM
From: Skywatcher  Respond to of 20039
 
Wisconsin Lawmakers Want Islam Teacher Booted
By P.J. Huffstutter, Times Staff Writer
July 25, 2006

CHICAGO — After Kevin Barrett started talking about a class he planned to teach this fall on Islam, the little-known lecturer at the University of Wisconsin-Madison found himself in the middle of a fierce political battle between the school and state politicians.

Barrett told a Milwaukee talk show host in June that he believed that the U.S. government used "controlled demolitions with explosives" on Sept. 11 to bring down the World Trade Center buildings and later said that the idea of a hijacked plane hitting the Pentagon was "preposterous." He plans to discuss these beliefs over one week of the 15-week course for undergraduate students.

ADVERTISEMENTWisconsin lawmakers, however, are trying to stop him.

In a letter delivered Monday to university administrators and Wisconsin Gov. James Doyle, state lawmakers demanded that school officials fire Barrett before the fall semester begins. Sixty-one of the legislature's 133 members — now on summer recess — signed the letter.

And if the school allows Barrett to teach "these lies," some of the legislators who signed the letter are threatening to cut the university system's public funding when the next state budget is reviewed next year, said Republican Rep. Stephen L. Nass.

"The rest of the world believes that the towers were brought down by terrorist actions. Taxpayers are spending $1 billion a year on the University of Wisconsin, and my office is being flooded with calls and e-mails by people who are furious that their dollars are going to be spent teaching such falsehoods," Nass said. "If the university doesn't do something to stop this, then lawmakers will step in and try to deal with it."

School officials say they have no reason to oust Barrett because free speech protects academic freedom.

"We cannot allow political pressure from critics of unpopular ideas to inhibit the free exchange of ideas," said Patrick Farrell, the school's provost. "The university is one of the chief financial engines of this state. It's short-sighted to handicap that engine just because legislators are annoyed with the views of one of our employees."

Barrett, 47, could not be reached for comment.

Academic experts say the controversy reflects an ongoing tug-of-war over free speech protections on college campuses. Some faculty members say they are careful about classroom discussions — particularly involving opinions that the public may find offensive.

"You can't tell someone that they can't say these things because it's not what a moral person would think," said Donald A. Downs, a University of Wisconsin professor of political science, law and journalism and president of Committee for Academic Freedom and Rights, a nonprofit organization. "I'm a supporter of the war on terror. I'm offended by him having these beliefs. But it's censorship to say he can't say these things."

Similar fights have been waged on other campuses in recent years.

The University of Colorado at Boulder is in the process of firing Ward L. Churchill, an ethnic studies professor who became the center of controversy last year when an essay he'd written comparing 9/11 victims to Nazis was unearthed. (The university system launched an investigation of Churchill's academic writings and concluded he'd committed fraud. Churchill, who says he's been targeted for his political beliefs, plans to fight the termination in federal court.)

Though faculty members' personal and political opinions should not bar them from teaching, there are limits on what happens in a classroom, said Jonathan Knight, director in the department of academic freedom and governance at the American Assn. of University Professors.

Yet it should be a school's faculty — not politicians — who say whether a person is fit to teach, Knight said.

"It's all on how the information is taught. If a person uses a classroom as a forum to proselytize his views on 9/11, he shouldn't be there. If he's using those views to explore other ideas and how people reason, that's different," Knight said.

"The thing we do not need is legislative bodies deciding to fund, or not fund, education depending on whether they like what a faculty member says. To do so would create a chilling effect across education," he said.

A lecturer and teacher's assistant at the university for the last three years, Barrett also is co-founder of the Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/11 Truth — a coalition of activists, academics and religious organizers who are pushing for an investigation into whether the U.S. government was involved in the attacks.

Barrett's course, "Islam: Religion and Culture," will focus on the history of Islam, the Koran and the faith's effect on modern-day U.S. society.