To: Honey_Bee who wrote (22571 ) 7/26/2006 9:46:51 PM From: queen90700 Respond to of 42834 Honey saidIf you prefer, I could name names and post quotes, but why bother, you already know more than I do about the person who tried to intimidate me with Bob Brinker Jr's computer prowess. I don't know anything about the person "who tried to intimidate" you as you claim. But it looks to me as if the poster is slamming Brinker Jr. more than you. It certainly looks like he's saying Brinker Jr. might be thought to be capable of such malicious and illegal acts.So make light of it this kind of thing and turn it back on the victim--how predictable. What "victim"? Were you victimized in any way? Did you suffer "emotional distress" or something from a message on a message board from someone who blew you some smoke about what some other person not even part of the conversation could do. You said yourself you don't believe that the person in question would do anything like he was accused of being capable of...so where's the "victim"?.I see that Kirk has already shown you the facts. Too bad your words weren't sweet--enjoy. My words were just fine. Kirk didn't show me anything but an old post from someone blowing smoke. I asked you if the person whom you said "informed" you of these potential hypothetical dastardly acts to be feared and anticipated, was the same person you were at the time responding to. A question asked and answered, no eating required. Just to reiterate, just because some poster who wants to needle someone says "this is what could happen", doesn't mean the poster knows what he's talking about, or that it will indeed happen. IOW, kirk's "documentation" is of an opinion from another poster only, and not documentation of any FACTS. No word-swallowing required. And Kirk is absolutely right, we don't post everything that we know about Bob Brinker. Thank God. You post enough fabrications, spin, and things that you don't know and can't prove as it is.