Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : FREE AMERICA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (9629)	7/26/2006 5:40:18 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 14758

Ethical concerns about tyrants are (in general) silly. We love the tyrants that are with us, and hate the ones that aren't This had a lot of validity during the Cold War, but is not so valid today, IMO. While we support Mubarak, Mushareff and the Arab Kingdoms who are dictators and have some human rights problems, they are not in the same league as Saddam, Kim Jong Il, Mugabe, and so on. Egypt to pick an example, doesn't have hundreds of mass graves, for example. I'm not really worried about ethical considerations except as they play out in the court of world opinion (in our favor). I am a fan of Kissinger and realpolitik. Presumably you are agreed we are right to keep propping up guys like Mubarak, Mushareff, the various royal families in the ME. I'd agree - I see them as like Marcos in the Philippines - someone to back to keep the communists from taking over, but to let fall by the wayside when their societies develop democratic movements strong enough to replace them. As to world opinion, I think it is worthless. If world opinion is strongly against something - like Reagan putting missiles in Europe - its probably a good thing. And if world opinion is strongly for something - like the nuclear freeze movement - its probably a bad thing.